JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Memtsoudis, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Heerdt, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Memtsoudis, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Heerdt, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2005;100:111-115
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000140242.25232.41


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Autonomic Mechanisms in the Age-Related Hypotensive Effect of Propofol

Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD*,{dagger}, Andrew H. S. The, BS*, and Paul M. Heerdt, MD, PhD*,{dagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Pharmacology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.

Address correspondence to Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hopsital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. Address e-mail to smemtsoudis{at}partners.org

We hypothesized that age-related differences in cardiovascular regulatory processes play a role in the augmented vasodepressor response to anesthetic induction with propofol in older subjects. To test this hypothesis, differences in baroreceptor responsiveness (BR) were first demonstrated in young adult (6–12 mo, n = 12) and aged (>42 mo, n = 12) New Zealand rabbits, and then the vasodepressor effect of propofol was compared in both the absence and presence of ganglionic blockade. For each age group, half of the animals were pretreated with 20 mg/kg IV hexamethonium (HEX) with the remaining half designated as controls. BR was first assessed by plotting cardiac cycle length as a function of the decline in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) produced by multiple IV boluses of tri-nitroglycerine. Propofol was then given as an IV bolus of 4.5, 6.4, or 8.4 mg/kg over 3 s. Each animal was studied three times, receiving a single dose in variable order with at least 7 days between injections. In control animals, marked age-related differences in BR were evident and propofol produced larger peak decreases in MAP in older rabbits at all doses. HEX pretreatment abolished BR for both young and aged rabbits. However, after HEX administration the vasodepressor response to propofol in young animals was enhanced by 150% at 4.5, 125% at 6.4, and 61% at 8.4 mg/kg, respectively, whereas the impact in aged animals was only 25%, 30%, and –10%, respectively. These data support the hypothesis that age-related enhancement of propofol-induced hypotension is largely a reflection of diminished BR.

IMPLICATIONS: Clinical experience suggests that aged individuals exhibit larger hypotensive effects after induction doses of propofol compared with young adults. The mechanism behind this observation remains largely unstudied. Our data gathered in a rabbit model suggest that age-related reduction in sensitivity of autonomic reflexes may contribute substantially to the increased hypotensive effect of propofol in the aged.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. K. Tremper
Anesthesia Information Systems: Developing the Physiologic Phenotype Database
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 620 - 621.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.