JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mythen, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mythen, M. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postanesthetic Care Unit
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Critical Care

Anesth Analg 2005;100:196-204
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000139376.45591.17

REVIEW ARTICLE

Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Dysfunction

Michael G. Mythen, MD, FRCA

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University College London, United Kingdom; and Portex Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Respiratory Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to Michael G. Mythen, MD, FRCA, The Portex Unit, Institute of Child Health, Sixth Floor Cardiac Wing, 30 Guilford St., London WC1N 1EH, UK. Address e-mail to m.mythen{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk Reprints will not be available from the author.

Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) tract dysfunction (PGID) is common and is associated with increased patient suffering and cost of care. The pathogenesis of PGID is complex and multifactorial. Traditional measures intended to reduce the incidence of PGID, such as the use of prokinetic drugs, nasogastric tube drainage, and the avoidance of early fluid and/or food intake, are apparently not beneficial. The administration of larger volumes of IV fluids to achieve predetermined increases in cardiac output has been shown in randomized trials to improve gut perfusion and reduce the incidence of PGID. A multimodal approach that includes limited surgical incision, regional local anesthesia, early mobilization, and enteral feeding has been associated with a dramatic reduction in postoperative complications, PGID, and length of hospital stay. However, none of these approaches has been validated in adequately powered multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Z. Ali, H. Bracht, V. Krejci, M. Beck, M. Stalder, L. Hiltebrand, J. Takala, S. Brandt, and S. M. Jakob
The Immediate and Sustained Effects of Volume Challenge on Regional Blood Flows in Pigs
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 595 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Liu and C. L. Wu
Effect of Postoperative Analgesia on Major Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Update of the Evidence
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 689 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.