JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feiner, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schuyler, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feiner, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schuyler, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Resuscitation
Right arrow Neuroanesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2005;100:215-225
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000142129.17005.73


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

Mild Hypothermia, but Not Propofol, Is Neuroprotective in Organotypic Hippocampal Cultures

John R. Feiner, MD, Philip E. Bickler, MD, PhD, Sergio Estrada, BS, Paul H. Donohoe, PhD, Christian S. Fahlman, PhD, and Jennifer A. Schuyler, BS

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philip E. Bickler, MD, PhD, Sciences 255, Box 0542, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143–0542. Address e-mail to bicklerp{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

The neuroprotective potency of anesthetics such as propofol compared to mild hypothermia remains undefined. Therefore, we determined whether propofol at two clinically relevant concentrations is as effective as mild hypothermia in preventing delayed neuron death in hippocampal slice cultures (HSC). Survival of neurons was assessed 2 and 3 days after 1 h oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) either at 37°C (with or without 10 or 100 µM propofol) or at an average temperature of 35°C during OGD (mild hypothermia). Cell death in CA1, CA3, and dentate neurons in each slice was measured with propidium iodide fluorescence. Mild hypothermia eliminated death in CA1, CA3, and dentate neurons but propofol protected dentate neurons only at a concentration of 10 µM; the more ischemia vulnerable CA1 and CA3 neurons were not protected by either 10 µM or 100 µM propofol. In slice cultures, the toxicity of 100 µM N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), 500 µM glutamate, and 20 µM {alpha}-amino-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) was not reduced by 100 µM propofol. Because propofol neuroprotection may involve gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated indirect inhibition of glutamate receptors (GluRs), the effects of propofol on GluR activity (calcium influx induced by GluR agonists) were studied in CA1 neurons in HSC, in isolated CA1 neurons, and in cortical brain slices. Propofol (100 and 200 µM, approximate burst suppression concentrations) decreased glutamate-mediated [Ca2+]i increases ({Delta}[Ca2+]i) responses by 25%–35% in isolated CA1 neurons and reduced glutamate and NMDA {Delta}[Ca2+]i in acute and cultured hippocampal slices by 35%–50%. In both CA1 neurons and cortical slices, blocking GABAA receptors with picrotoxin reduced the inhibition of GluRs substantially. We conclude that mild hypothermia, but not propofol, protects CA1 and CA3 neurons in hippocampal slice cultures subjected to oxygen and glucose deprivation. Propofol was not neuroprotective at concentrations that reduce glutamate and NMDA receptor responses in cortical and hippocampal neurons.

IMPLICATIONS: The neuroprotective qualities of propofol are controversial. In rat hippocampal slice cultures, mild hypothermia (35°C), but not propofol, was protective after oxygen and glucose deprivation. Failure of propofol neuroprotection in this model may be related to relatively modest inhibition of glutamate receptor responses and excitotoxicity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
H. Cimarosti and J. M. Henley
Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Neuronal Death in Ischemia Using In Vitro Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation: Potential Involvement of Protein SUMOylation
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2008; 14(6): 626 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. J. Howell
Carotid endarterectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 119 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
W. S. Al-Jahdari, S. Saito, T. Nakano, and F. Goto
Propofol induces growth cone collapse and neurite retractions in chick explant culture: [Le propofol provoque un collapsus des cones de croissance et des retractions des neurites de poussin embryonnaire en culture].
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2006; 53(11): 1078 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.