JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taboada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Álvarez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taboada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Álvarez, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2005;100:250-254
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143338.69202.76


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Plantar Flexion Seems More Reliable than Dorsiflexion with Labat’s Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison

Manuel Taboada, MD*, Peter G. Atanassoff, MD{dagger}, Jaime Rodríguez, MD, PhD*, Joaquín Cortés, MD, PhD*, Sabela Del Rio, MD*, Juan Lagunilla, MD*, Francisco Gude, MD*, and Julián Álvarez, MD, PhD*

*University of Santiago de Compostela, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Spain; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Manuel Taboada Muñiz, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Address e-mail to manutabo{at}mixmail.com and manutabo@yahoo.es.

Labat’s classic approach to the sciatic nerve has not been able to show which motor response of the foot provides a more frequent rate of complete sensory and motor block. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared plantar flexion with dorsiflexion with regard to onset time and efficacy of sciatic nerve block using the classic posterior approach. A total of 80 patients undergoing hallux valgus repair were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve block after evoked plantar flexion (n = 40) or dorsiflexion (n = 40). Twenty milliliters of 0.75% ropivacaine was injected after the motor response was elicited at <0.5 mA. Success rate was defined as complete sensory and motor block in all sciatic nerve distributions associated with a pain-free surgery. Time required for onset of sensory and motor block of the foot was recorded. Success was more frequent after elicited plantar flexion (87.5%) than dorsiflexion (55%; P < 0.05). Onset of complete sensory and motor block of the foot was faster after elicited plantar flexion (10 ± 10 min and 13 ± 10 min, respectively) compared with dorsiflexion (20 ± 11 min and 24 ± 12 min; P < 0.05). We conclude that plantar flexion of the foot predicts a shorter onset time and a more frequent success rate than dorsiflexion with Labat’s classic posterior sciatic nerve block.

IMPLICATIONS: Plantar flexion of the foot during Labat’s classic posterior sciatic nerve block predicts a shorter onset time and more frequent success rate than dorsiflexion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Q. H. De Tran, A. Clemente, and R. J. Finlayson
A review of approaches and techniques for lower extremity nerve blocks: [Un bilan des approches et techniques pour les blocs nerveux du membre inferieur]
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2007; 54(11): 922 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Pianezza, M.-L. Gilbert, V. Minville, D. Filsinger, Q. Gobert, A. Guerot, R. Fuzier, and O. Fourcade
A Modified Mid-Femoral Approach to the Sciatic Nerve Block: A Correlation Between Evoked Motor Response and Sensory Block
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 528 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. S. Hagon, O. Itani, J. H. Bidgoli, and P. J. Van der Linden
Parasacral Sciatic Nerve Block: Does the Elicited Motor Response Predict the Success Rate?
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 263 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Domingo-Triado, S. Selfa, F. Martinez, D. Sanchez-Contreras, M. Reche, J. Tecles, M. T. Crespo, J. M. Palanca, and B. Moro
Ultrasound Guidance for Lateral Midfemoral Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1270 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, F. Ruggieri, D. Mamo, G. Fanelli, and A. Casati
Minimum effective anesthetic concentration (MEAC) for sciatic nerve block: subgluteus and popliteal approaches: [Concentration anesthesique efficace minimale (CAEM) pour un bloc du nerf sciatique : approches sous-gluteale et poplitee]
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2007; 54(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, F. Singelyn, and Z. Koscielniak-Nielsen
Stimulating Catheters in Continuous Popliteal Block
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1594 - 1595.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. F. Stevens, R. Werdehausen, H. Hermanns, and P. Lipfert
Skin temperature during regional anesthesia of the lower extremity.
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1247 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Taboada, J. Rodriguez, C. Valino, J. Carceller, B. Bascuas, J. Oliveira, J. Alvarez, F. Gude, and P. G. Atanassoff
What Is the Minimum Effective Volume of Local Anesthetic Required for Sciatic Nerve Blockade? A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between a Popliteal and a Subgluteal Approach
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 593 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.