JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Furuya, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Furuya, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2005;100:266-268
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000140241.97973.73


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Unintentional Intrapleural Insertion of an Epidural Catheter: Should We Remove It or Leave It In Situ to Provide Perioperative Analgesia?

Satoki Inoue, MD, Naoko Nishimine, MD, and Hitoshi Furuya, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Satoki Inoue, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. Address e-mail to seninoue{at}naramed-u.ac.jp

We report three patients who had intrapleural insertion of an intended thoracic epidural catheter. These misplaced catheters were used for local anesthetic administration. Bupivacaine injection via these catheters in two cases was effective for reducing postoperative pain. We conclude that if an intended thoracic epidural catheter is found to be in the intrapleural cavity at the time of surgery and if correct replacement of the catheter into the epidural space is not believed to be feasible after surgery, then the administration of local anesthetic through the intrapleural catheter could be considered as a potential alterative analgesic method.

IMPLICATIONS: In cases in which an intended thoracic epidural catheter is found to be in the intrapleural cavity at the time of surgery, the administration of local anesthetic through the intrapleural catheter could be a potential alterative postoperative analgesic method.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. A. Cordone, C. L. Wu, A. L. Maceda, and J. M. Richman
Unrecognized Contralateral Intrapleural Catheter: Bilateral Blockade May Obscure Detection of Failed Epidural Catheterization
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 735 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Alagoz, H. Sazak, S. Ozkazanc, and E. Savkiliodlu
Errant Thoracic Epidural Catheterization
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 236 - 236.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.