JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Doig, G. S. Articles by Delaney, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Doig, G. S. Articles by Delaney, A.

---

CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

A Review of the True Methodological Quality of Nutritional Support Trials Conducted in the Critically Ill: Time for Improvement

From the Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia, the Department of Nutrition, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia and Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

In this review we sought to appraise the true methodological quality of nutritional support studies conducted in critically ill patients and to compare these findings to the methodological quality of sepsis trials. An extensive literature search revealed 111 randomized controlled trials conducted in critically ill patients evaluating the impact of nutritional support interventions on clinically meaningful outcomes. Compared with sepsis trials, nutritional support studies were significantly less likely to use blinding (32 of 40 versus 35 of 111, P < 0.001) or present an intention-to-treat analysis (37 of 40 versus 64 of 111, P < 0.001). There was a trend toward the less frequent use of randomization methods that are known to maintain allocation concealment (12 of 40 versus 19 of 111, P = 0.10). Although nutritional support studies demonstrated a significant increase in the use of blinding after the publication of the CONSORT statement in 1996 (9 of 47 versus 26 of 64 post-CONSORT, P = 0.023), there were no improvements in other key areas. Previous publications have described the overall methodological quality of sepsis trials as "poor." Nutritional support studies were significantly worse than sepsis trials in all aspects of methodological quality, and there were few improvements noted over time. To detect important differences in clinically meaningful outcomes in critical care, the methodological quality of future studies must be improved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. S. Doig, F. Simpson, S. Finfer, A. Delaney, A. R. Davies, I. Mitchell, G. Dobb, and for the Nutrition Guidelines Investigators of the Effect of Evidence-Based Feeding Guidelines on Mortality of Critically Ill Adults: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, December 17, 2008; 300(23): 2731 - 2741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pontes-Arruda, S. DeMichele, A. Seth, and P. Singer The Use of an Inflammation-Modulating Diet in Patients With Acute Lung Injury or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Data JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 2008; 32(6): 596 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999