Anesth Analg 2005;100:580-584
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B
GENERAL ARTICLES
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients
Sylvain Gander, MD*,
Philippe Frascarolo, PhD*,
Michel Suter, MD ,
Donat R. Spahn, MD*, and
Lennart Magnusson, MD, PhD*
Departments of *Anesthesiology and Surgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Lennart Magnusson, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, CHUV BH-10, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Address e-mail to lennart.magnusson{at}chuv.hospvd.ch.
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied during induction of anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation and increases the duration of nonhypoxic apnea in nonobese patients. PEEP also prevents atelectasis formation in morbidly obese patients. Because morbidly obese patients have difficult airway management more often and because arterial desaturation develops rapidly, we studied the clinical benefit of PEEP applied during anesthesia induction. Thirty morbidly obese patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the PEEP group, patients breathed 100% O2 through a continuous positive airway pressure device (10 cm H2O) for 5 min. After induction of anesthesia, they were mechanically ventilated with PEEP (10 cm H2O) for another 5 min until tracheal intubation. In the control group, the sequence was the same but without any continuous positive airway pressure or PEEP. We measured apnea duration until Spo2 reached 90% and we performed arterial blood gases analyses just before apnea and at 92% Spo2. Nonhypoxic apnea duration was longer in the PEEP group compared with the control group (188 ± 46 versus 127 ± 43 s; P = 0.002). Pao2 was higher before apnea in the PEEP group (P = 0.038). Application of positive airway pressure during induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients increases nonhypoxic apnea duration by 50%.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Poirier, M. A. Alpert, L. A. Fleisher, P. D. Thompson, H. J. Sugerman, L. E. Burke, P. Marceau, B. A. Franklin, and on behalf of the American Heart Association Obesit
Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Severely Obese Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association
Circulation,
July 7, 2009;
120(1):
86 - 95.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-M. Delay, M. Sebbane, B. Jung, D. Nocca, D. Verzilli, Y. Pouzeratte, M. E. Kamel, J.-M. Fabre, J.-J. Eledjam, and S. Jaber
The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation to Enhance Preoxygenation in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2008;
107(5):
1707 - 1713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cadi, T. Guenoun, D. Journois, J.-M. Chevallier, J.-L. Diehl, and D. Safran
Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation
Br. J. Anaesth.,
May 1, 2008;
100(5):
709 - 716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|