JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mckay, R. E. Articles by Mckay, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mckay, R. E. Articles by Mckay, W. R. Related Collections Airway Pharmacology

---

ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Airway Reflexes Return More Rapidly After Desflurane Anesthesia Than After Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Rachel Eshima Mckay, MD^*, Mary Jane C. Large, RN, BSN, Michel C. Balea, MS^*, and Warren R. Mckay, MD^*

Departments of *Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, and Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eshima Mckay, Department of Anesthesia, C-450, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0648. Address e-mail to eshimar{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu.

Patients given a more soluble inhaled anesthetic usually take longer to awaken from anesthesia than do patients given a less soluble anesthetic. In the present study, we tested whether such a delay in awakening was also associated with a delay in restoration of protective airway reflexes. Patients were randomly assigned to receive desflurane (n = 31) or sevoflurane (n = 33) via a laryngeal mask airway. Demographics did not differ between groups. The average minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration fraction for both groups was 0.62, and the mean (±sd) minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration hours was 1.00 ± 0.68 for desflurane versus 0.95 ± 0.57 for sevoflurane, although more patients given sevoflurane also received regional anesthesia (17 for sevoflurane and 8 for desflurane). The time from stopping anesthetic administration to appropriate response to command was longer after sevoflurane (5.5 ± 3.1 versus 3.4 ± 1.9 min; P < 0.01). In addition, the time from first response to command to ability to swallow 20 mL of water without coughing or drooling was longer after sevoflurane. At 2 min after responding to command, all patients given desflurane were able to swallow without coughing or drooling, whereas 55% of patients given sevoflurane coughed and/or drooled (P < 0.001). At 6 min after responding to command, 18% of patients given sevoflurane still could not swallow without coughing or drooling (P < 0.05). We conclude that desflurane allows an earlier return of protective airway reflexes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Mathews, V. Gaba, B. Zaku, and G. G. Neuman Can Remifentanil Replace Nitrous Oxide During Anesthesia for Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery with Desflurane and Fentanyl? Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 101 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. McKay, A. Bostrom, M. C. Balea, and W. R. McKay Airway Responses During Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane Administration via a Laryngeal Mask Airway in Smokers Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1147 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. R. Nordmann, J. A. Read, S. M. Sale, P. A. Stoddart, and A. R. Wolf Emergence and recovery in children after desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia: effect of anaesthetic duration Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 779 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. I. Eger II and S. L. Shafer Tutorial: Context-Sensitive Decrement Times for Inhaled Anesthetics Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 688 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999