JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schuster, M. Articles by Standl, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schuster, M. Articles by Standl, T. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Anesthetic Techniques Regional Anesthesia

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

A Retrospective Comparison of Costs for Regional and General Anesthesia Techniques

Martin Schuster, MD, MA^*, André Gottschalk, MD^*, Jürgen Berger, PhD, and Thomas Standl, MD^*

*Department of Anesthesiology and Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Martin Schuster, MD, MA, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Address e-mail to m.schuster{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de.

In this retrospective study, we compared the costs for three different regional anesthesia techniques with the costs of general anesthesia (GA). A total of 1587 anesthesia cases which were performed for orthopedic and trauma patients over a 1-yr period in a tertiary level, university hospital setting were analyzed. The anesthesia technique-related costs were determined calculating case-specific costs for personnel, supplies, and drugs. The techniques were compared on the basis of anesthesia costs and surgical procedure duration. As a result, we found that the costs per surgical minute largely depend on the surgical procedure duration. Based on the regression function, the cost advantage of spinal anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 13% for a 50-min case, 9% for a 100-min case, and 5% for a 200-min case. The cost disadvantage of brachial plexus anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 19% for a 50-min case, 8% in a 100-min case, and 1% for a 200-min case. We found no difference in costs between epidural and GA. We concluded that cost comparisons of anesthesia techniques largely depend on the surgical duration of the cases studied. Even in a teaching hospital setting, spinal anesthesia has economic advantages over GA. Especially for short cases, brachial plexus block is more expensive in this setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Gonano, U. Leitgeb, C. Sitzwohl, G. Ihra, C. Weinstabl, and S. C. Kettner Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery: Anesthesia Drug and Supply Costs Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 524 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Bloomfield Costs Are Not the Only Thing We Should Be Concerned with in Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1562 - 1562. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999