| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||





From the Departments of *Surgical, and
Medical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden,
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany,
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Rafael Kawati, MD, DEAA, Department of Surgical Sciences/Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden. Address e-mail to r.kawati{at}telia.com.
If peak inspiratory airway pressure (Ppeak) is used to monitor airway patency, progressive obstruction of the endotracheal tube (ETT) resulting from secretions can go undetected for a prolonged period. The reason is that any increase in Ppeak depends not only on the degree of narrowing but also on the inspiratory flow (
) rate. Although the impact of narrowing on low inspiratory
is small, its decelerating effect on the high expiratory
is pronounced and, hence, easily detectable. Dividing the volume-flow curve of a passive expiration into five consecutive segments (slices) and calculating the time constants (
E) of these slices allows for analyzing whether and how expiratory
is impeded by a partial obstruction. In nine piglets, during volume-controlled ventilation, three grades of ETT obstruction were created with an external clamp. In all animals the
E increased with ETT obstruction (mean for the first slice: 550 ms with unobstructed ETT; grade 1: 661; grade 2: 877; and grade 3: 1563 ms, respectively) and this increase was significant with grade 2 and 3 obstruction. Ppeak, by contrast, did not increase significantly (base: 13, grade 1: 14, grade 2: 15 cm H2O) until the most severe (grade 3: 20 cm H2O) obstruction was created. We conclude that partial obstruction of the ETT can be reliably monitored with the expiratory
signal and has the potential of monitoring ETT narrowing in ventilator-dependent patients independent of the inspiratory
pattern applied.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Unzueta, J. I. Casas, and M. V. Moral Pressure-Controlled Versus Volume-Controlled Ventilation During One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1029 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kawati, L. Vimlati, J. Guttmann, G. Hedenstierna, U. Sjostrand, S. Schumann, and M. Lichtwarck-Aschoff Change in expiratory flow detects partial endotracheal tube obstruction in pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 650 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|