Anesth Analg 2005;100:1093-1106
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148691.33690.AC
ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Perioperative Fluid Management and Clinical Outcomes in Adults
Michael P. W. Grocott, BSc, MRCP, FRCA*,
Michael G. Mythen, MD, FRCA*, and
Tong J. Gan, MD, FRCA, FFARCS(I)
*Centre for Anaesthesia, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tong J. Gan, MD, FRCA, FFARCS(I), Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu.
The administration of IV fluid to avoid dehydration, maintain an effective circulating volume, and prevent inadequate tissue perfusion should be considered, along with the maintenance of sleep, pain relief, and muscular relaxation, a core element of the perioperative practice of anesthesia. Knowledge of the effects of different fluids has increased in recent years, and the choice of fluid type in a variety of clinical situations can now be rationally guided by an understanding of the physicochemical and biological properties of the various crystalloid and colloid solutions available. However, there are few useful clinical outcome data to guide this decision. Deciding how much fluid to give has historically been more controversial than choosing which fluid to use. A number of clinical studies support the notion that an approach based on administering fluids to achieve maximal left ventricular stroke volume (while avoiding excess fluid administration and consequent impairment of left ventricular performance) may improve outcomes. In this article, we review the available fluid types and strategies of fluid administration and discuss their relationship to clinical outcomes in adults.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Kungys, D. D. Rose, and N. W. Fleming
Stroke Volume Variation During Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2009;
109(6):
1823 - 1830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Derichard, E. Robin, B. Tavernier, M. Costecalde, M. Fleyfel, J. Onimus, G. Lebuffe, J.-P. Chambon, and B. Vallet
Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2009;
103(5):
678 - 684.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mongardon, A. Dyson, and M. Singer
Pharmacological optimization of tissue perfusion
Br. J. Anaesth.,
July 1, 2009;
103(1):
82 - 88.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Concha, V. F. Mertz, L. I. Cortinez, K. A. Gonzalez, J. M. Butte, F. Lopez, G. Pinedo, and A. Zuniga
The Volume of Lactated Ringer's Solution Required to Maintain Preload and Cardiac Index During Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2009;
108(2):
616 - 622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Riesmeier, A. Schellhaass, J. Boldt, and S. Suttner
Crystalloid/Colloid Versus Crystalloid Intravascular Volume Administration Before Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients: The Influence on Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2009;
108(2):
650 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Leonard, C. M. Allsager, J. L. Parker, A. Swami, and J. P. Thompson
Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture
Br. J. Anaesth.,
August 1, 2008;
101(2):
166 - 170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Deflandre, V. Bonhomme, and P. Hans
Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
February 1, 2008;
100(2):
245 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Holte, N. B. Foss, J. Andersen, L. Valentiner, C. Lund, P. Bie, and H. Kehlet
Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study
Br. J. Anaesth.,
October 1, 2007;
99(4):
500 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Holte, B. B. Kristensen, L. Valentiner, N. B. Foss, H. Husted, and H. Kehlet
Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Management in Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2007;
105(2):
465 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2007;
104(6):
1380 - 1396.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tatara and C. Tashiro
Quantitative Analysis of Fluid Balance During Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2007;
104(2):
347 - 354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bundgaard-Nielsen, B. Ruhnau, N. H. Secher, and H. Kehlet
Flow-related techniques for preoperative goal-directed fluid optimization
Br. J. Anaesth.,
January 1, 2007;
98(1):
38 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Bellamy
Wet, dry or something else?
Br. J. Anaesth.,
December 1, 2006;
97(6):
755 - 757.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Solus-Biguenet, M. Fleyfel, B. Tavernier, E. Kipnis, J. Onimus, E. Robin, G. Lebuffe, C. Decoene, F. R. Pruvot, and B. Vallet
Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
December 1, 2006;
97(6):
808 - 816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. W. Grocott, M. G. Mythen, and T. J. Gan
Differentiating "Volumetric Preload Monitoring" and Assessing "Fluid Responsiveness"
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2006;
102(2):
652 - 652.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Reuter and A. E. Goetz
Differentiating "Volumetric Preload Monitoring" and Assessing "Fluid Responsiveness"
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2006;
102(2):
651 - 652.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Preisman, S. Kogan, H. Berkenstadt, and A. Perel
Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators
Br. J. Anaesth.,
December 1, 2005;
95(6):
746 - 755.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Corn
Countries, Rooms, and Plants, but Not Mammalian Cells
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2005;
101(5):
1561 - 1561.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|