JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Popescu, W. M. Articles by Barash, P. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Popescu, W. M. Articles by Barash, P. G. Related Collections Cardiovascular Monitoring (Cardiac)

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Phantom Aortic Valve Pressure Gradient: Discrepancies Between Cardiac Catheterization and Doppler Echocardiography

Wanda M. Popescu, MD^*, Edward Prokop, MD, John A. Elefteriades, MD, Kevin Kett, MD, and Paul G. Barash, MD^*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Surgery (Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery), Yale University School of Medicine; Department of Radiology, Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven; and Department of Medicine, Waterbury Hospital, Connecticut

Address correspondence to Wanda M. Popescu, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., PO Box 20851, New Haven, CT 06520-8051. Address e-mail to Wanda.Popescu{at}yale.edu.

We present a case of a patient scheduled for mitral valve replacement and possible aortic valve replacement. On Doppler examination, her peak transaortic pressure gradient measured on three separate occasions (pre-, intra-, and postoperatively) was approximately 60 mm Hg. In contrast, the peak-to-peak pressure gradient (cardiac catheterization) was 11 mm Hg. This latter gradient was confirmed in the operating room by direct simultaneous measurement of the pressures in the left ventricle and ascending aorta. Potential causes for this discrepancy are discussed, among which the "pressure recovery phenomenon" is considered the most important.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. F. Souza Ghost-Boostering Phantom Gradients Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 653 - 654. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999