JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, R. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, R. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Critical Care
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research
Right arrow Airway

Anesth Analg 2005;100:1439-1446
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148695.37190.34


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Cannot Intubate–Cannot Ventilate and Difficult Intubation Strategies: Results of a Canadian National Survey

David T. Wong, MD*, Kevin Lai, BSc{dagger}, Frances F. Chung, FRCPC*, and Ranee Y. Ho{ddagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, {dagger}University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and {ddagger}McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David T. Wong, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8. Address e-mail to david.wong{at}uhn.on.ca.

The purpose of this study was to determine the preferences of Canadian anesthesiologists in difficult intubation and cannot intubate–cannot ventilate (CICV) situations. Using a mailed survey, we asked anesthesiologists their preferences for and comfort level in using (a) alternative airway devices in a difficult intubation scenario and (b) infraglottic airway in a CICV scenario. Chi-square analysis and Student’s t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables. Nine-hundred-seventy-one of 2066 surveys were returned. In the difficult intubation scenario, the preferred alternative airway devices were lighted stylet (45%), fiberoptic bronchoscope (26%), and intubating laryngeal mask airway (20%). Only 57% of respondents had encountered a CICV situation in real life. In the CICV scenario, preferred infraglottic airways were cricothyroidotomy by IV catheter (51%), percutaneous cricothyroidotomy (28%), and tracheostomy by surgeon (14%). Anesthesiologists had little experience and were uncomfortable with open surgical infraglottic airways. Anesthesiologists with experience using infraglottic airways on mannequins were more comfortable using them in patients (P < 0.001). In conclusion, in a difficult intubation scenario, the lighted stylet has emerged as the preferred alternative airway device. In a CICV scenario, respondents preferred cricothyroidotomy by IV catheter, followed by percutaneous cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy by surgeon. Practice on mannequins was associated with improved comfort in using infraglottic airways in patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Weng, Z.-Y. Xu, J. Liu, D. Ma, and D.-S. Liu
Placement of the Univent Tube Without Fiberoptic Bronchoscope Assistance
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2010; 110(2): 508 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. E. W. Hamaekers, T. Gotz, P. A. J. Borg, and D. Enk
Achieving an adequate minute volume through a 2 mm transtracheal catheter in simulated upper airway obstruction using a modified industrial ejector
Br. J. Anaesth., January 24, 2010; (2010): aep391v1 - aep391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. W. Lim and S. W. Benham
Relationship of inspiratory and expiratory times to upper airway resistance during pulsatile needle cricothyrotomy ventilation with generic delivery circuit
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2010; 104(1): 98 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
R J Price and C Laird
A survey of surgical airway experiences and equipment among immediate care doctors
Emerg. Med. J., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 438 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Martin and D. J. Buggy
New airway equipment: opportunities for enhanced safety
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 734 - 738.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. M. Assmann, D. T. Wong, and E. Morales
A Comparison of a New Indicator-Guided with a Conventional Wire-Guided Percutaneous Cricothyroidotomy Device in Mannequins
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 148 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. T. Wong
The LMA Is a Critical Rescue Device in Airway Emergencies
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1889 - 1889.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. F. Atkins
The LMA Is a Critical Rescue Device in Airway Emergencies
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1888 - 1889.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.