| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Raymond Wee-Lip Goy, MMed Anesthesia, FANZCA, Department of Anesthesia, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd., Singapore 119074. Address e-mail to raygoywl{at}singnet.com.sg.
The combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) has been associated with prolonged motor recovery and more frequent arterial hypotension as compared with a single-shot spinal (SSS) technique. We determined the median effective dose (MED) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for CSE and SSS by using the up-down sequential allocation technique. Sixty male patients were randomly allocated to receive intrathecal administration through an SSS or CSE technique. Needle insertion occurred at the L3-4 interspace in all patients. In SSS, 9.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered through a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. In CSE, a 17-gauge Tuohy needle with 4 mL of air was used to locate the epidural space, through which a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle was introduced and 7.0 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered. The dosing adjustment was 0.5 mg. A "successful" outcome was arbitrarily defined as sensory anesthesia at or above the T6 dermatome lasting for 60 min. A "success" resulted in a 0.5-mg decrement, whereas a "failure" resulted in a 0.5-mg increment in the next patient. There were 13 successes in both groups. The MED of bupivacaine was 9.18 mg (95% confidence interval, 8.899.47 mg) for CSE as compared with 11.37 mg (95% confidence interval, 10.8811.86 mg) for SSS (P < 0.001). CSE required 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 14.9%23.6%) less local anesthetic to achieve the defined clinical target. We found significant discrepancies in the MED of hyperbaric bupivacaine between the two techniques. Under similar clinical conditions, a 20% decrement in the dose of bupivacaine may be warranted whenever CSE is intended in place of SSS.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Ithnin, Y. Lim, A. T. Sia, and C. E. Ocampo Combined Spinal Epidural Causes a Higher Level of Block than Equivalent, Single-Shot Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Patients Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 746 - 746. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lim, W. Teoh, and A. T. Sia Combined Spinal Epidural Does Not Cause a Higher Sensory Block than Single Shot Spinal Technique for Cesarean Delivery in Laboring Women Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1540 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Veering Hemodynamic effects of central neural blockade in elderly patients/Les effets hemodynamiques du bloc nerveux central chez les patients ages Can J Anesth, February 1, 2006; 53(2): 117 - 121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|