JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Airway
Right arrow Pediatrics

Anesth Analg 2005;100:1599-1604
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000150940.57369.B5


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

Dose-Response of Remifentanil for Tracheal Intubation in Infants

Mark W. Crawford, MBBS, FRCPC, Jason Hayes, MD, FRCPC, and Juliana M. Tan, MBBS, MMed (Anesth)

Department of Anaesthesia and the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark W. Crawford, MBBS, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. Address e-mail to mark.crawford{at}sickkids.ca.

To compare the dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation in infants and children, 32 healthy full-term infants and 32 children were anesthetized with 10 µg/kg glycopyrrolate and 4.0 mg/kg propofol and administered 1 of 4 doses of remifentanil (1.25, 1.50, 1.75, or 2.00 µg/kg) to facilitate tracheal intubation. We determined the effective doses of remifentanil in 50% (ED50) and 98% (ED98) of patients by using logistic regression analysis. We found that logistic regression curves were similar for infants and children (P = 0.38). ED50 and ED98 values for remifentanil were 1.70 ± 0.1 µg/kg and 2.88 ± 0.5 µg/kg, respectively. In a second double-blind study, 24 infants were anesthetized with propofol and randomized to receive either 3.0 µg/kg remifentanil or 2.0 mg/kg succinylcholine to facilitate tracheal intubation. The duration of apnea, tracheal intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes were determined. We found that the duration of apnea and intubating conditions after propofol/remifentanil were similar to those after propofol/succinylcholine. Bradycardia, hypotension, and chest wall rigidity did not occur. We conclude that the dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation is similar in infants and children. Propofol/remifentanil provides clinically acceptable intubating conditions, stable hemodynamics, and a duration of apnea comparable to that with propofol/succinylcholine in infants.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. T. Verghese, R. S. Hannallah, M. Brennan, J. L. Yarvitz, K. A. Hummer, K. M. Patel, J. He, and R. McCarter
The Effect of Intranasal Administration of Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway Response After Sevoflurane Induction of Anesthesia in Children
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1176 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
Y. P. e Silva, R. S. Gomez, J. de Oliveira Marcatto, T. A. Maximo, R. F. Barbosa, and A. C. S. e Silva
Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2007; 92(4): F293 - F294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.