JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zaric, D. Articles by Punjasawadwong, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zaric, D. Articles by Punjasawadwong, Y. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Complications Regional Anesthesia Pharmacology

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Transient Neurologic Symptoms After Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine Versus Other Local Anesthetics: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Dusanka Zaric, MD, PhD^*, Christian Christiansen, MD^*, Nathan L. Pace, MD, MStat, and Yodying Punjasawadwong, MD

*Department of Anesthesiology, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Department of Anesthesiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dusanka Zaric, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Ndr. Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark. Address e-mail to zaricdus{at}dadlnet.dk.

Lidocaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern. However, during the last 10 years, a number of reports have appeared implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities—transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). In this study, we sought to compare the frequency of 1) TNS and 2) neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine with that after other local anesthetics. Published trials were identified by computerized searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, LILAC, and EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles. The search identified 14 trials reporting 1347 patients, 117 of whom developed TNS. None of these patients showed signs of neurologic complications. The relative risk for developing TNS after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine was higher than with other local anesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and mepivacaine), i.e., 4.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.98–9.54). There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; in all patients, the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the 10th postoperative day.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Umbrain, L. Shi, M.-H. Lauwers, I. Smolders, Y. Michotte, and F. Camu Intrathecal lidocaine elevates prostaglandin E2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid: a microdialysis study in freely moving rats Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 716 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Luck, P. D. W. Fettes, and J. A. W. Wildsmith Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 705 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-J. Lee, S.-J. Bai, J.-S. Lee, W.-O. Kim, Y.-S. Shin, and K.-Y. Lee The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 824 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Casati, G. Fanelli, G. Danelli, M. Berti, D. Ghisi, M. Brivio, M. Putzu, and A. Barbagallo Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Preservative-Free 2-Chlorprocaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 959 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Brull, C. J. L. McCartney, V. W. S. Chan, and H. El-Beheiry Neurological Complications After Regional Anesthesia: Contemporary Estimates of Risk Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 965 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Casati, G. Danelli, M. Berti, A. Fioro, A. Fanelli, C. Benassi, G. Petronella, and G. Fanelli Intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical evaluation. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Lambert Is TNS Really No Big Deal? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 654 - 654. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zaric, C. Christiansen, N. L. Pace, and Y. Punjasawadwong Is TNS Really No Big Deal? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 654 - 655. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Rowlingson Postoperative Pain: To Diversify Is to Satisfy Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Horlocker and D. R. Brown Evidence-Based Medicine: Haute Couture or the Emperor's New Clothes? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1807 - 1810. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999