Anesth Analg 2005;100:1811-1816
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136844.87857.78
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
Transient Neurologic Symptoms After Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine Versus Other Local Anesthetics: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials
Dusanka Zaric, MD, PhD*,
Christian Christiansen, MD*,
Nathan L. Pace, MD, MStat , and
Yodying Punjasawadwong, MD
*Department of Anesthesiology, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Department of Anesthesiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dusanka Zaric, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Ndr. Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark. Address e-mail to zaricdus{at}dadlnet.dk.
Lidocaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern. However, during the last 10 years, a number of reports have appeared implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremitiestransient neurologic symptoms (TNS). In this study, we sought to compare the frequency of 1) TNS and 2) neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine with that after other local anesthetics. Published trials were identified by computerized searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, LILAC, and EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles. The search identified 14 trials reporting 1347 patients, 117 of whom developed TNS. None of these patients showed signs of neurologic complications. The relative risk for developing TNS after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine was higher than with other local anesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and mepivacaine), i.e., 4.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.989.54). There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; in all patients, the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the 10th postoperative day.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Lima, M. M. Bianchin, and W. Marques Jr
Permanent Asymmetric Neurologic Deficits After Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2009;
109(2):
686 - 686.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. J. Umbrain, M.-H. Lauwers, L. Shi, I. Smolders, Y. Michotte, and J. Poelaert
Comparison of the effects of intrathecal administration of levobupivacaine and lidocaine on the prostaglandin E2 and glutamate increases in cerebrospinal fluid: a microdialysis study in freely moving rats
Br. J. Anaesth.,
April 1, 2009;
102(4):
540 - 545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Nair, A. Abrishami, J. Lermitte, and F. Chung
Systematic review of spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy
Br. J. Anaesth.,
March 1, 2009;
102(3):
307 - 315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Umbrain, L. Shi, M.-H. Lauwers, I. Smolders, Y. Michotte, and F. Camu
Intrathecal lidocaine elevates prostaglandin E2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid: a microdialysis study in freely moving rats
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2008;
101(5):
716 - 722.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Luck, P. D. W. Fettes, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2008;
101(5):
705 - 710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Lee, S.-J. Bai, J.-S. Lee, W.-O. Kim, Y.-S. Shin, and K.-Y. Lee
The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2008;
107(3):
824 - 827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, G. Danelli, M. Berti, D. Ghisi, M. Brivio, M. Putzu, and A. Barbagallo
Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Preservative-Free 2-Chlorprocaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2007;
104(4):
959 - 964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Brull, C. J. L. McCartney, V. W. S. Chan, and H. El-Beheiry
Neurological Complications After Regional Anesthesia: Contemporary Estimates of Risk
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2007;
104(4):
965 - 974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Casati, G. Danelli, M. Berti, A. Fioro, A. Fanelli, C. Benassi, G. Petronella, and G. Fanelli
Intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical evaluation.
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2006;
103(1):
234 - 238.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Lambert
Is TNS Really No Big Deal?
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2006;
102(2):
654 - 654.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Zaric, C. Christiansen, N. L. Pace, and Y. Punjasawadwong
Is TNS Really No Big Deal?
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2006;
102(2):
654 - 655.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Rowlingson
Postoperative Pain: To Diversify Is to Satisfy
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2005;
101(5S_Suppl):
S1 - 4.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Horlocker and D. R. Brown
Evidence-Based Medicine: Haute Couture or the Emperor's New Clothes?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2005;
100(6):
1807 - 1810.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|