Anesth Analg 2005;101:195-199
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000168491.59329.52
ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH
The Impact of Productivity-Based Incentives on Faculty Salary-Based Compensation
Ronald D. Miller, MD, and
Neal H. Cohen, MD
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ronald D. Miller, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Address e-mail to aaeditor{at}pacbell.net.
In industry and academic anesthesia departments, incentives and bonus payments based on productivity are accounting for an increasing proportion of a total compensation. When incentives are primarily based on clinical productivity, the impact on the distribution of total compensation to the faculty is not known. We compared a pure salary-based compensation methodology based entirely on academic rank to salary plus incentives and/or clinical productivity compensation (i.e., billable hours). The change in compensation methodology resulted in two major findings. First, the productivity-based compensation resulted in a large increase in the variability of total compensation among faculty, especially at the Assistant Professor rank. Second, the mean difference in total compensation between Assistant and Full Professors decreased. The authors conclude that this particular incentive plan, primarily directed toward clinical productivity, dramatically changed the distribution of total compensation in favor of junior faculty. Although not analytically investigated, the potential impact of these changes on faculty morale and distribution of faculty activities is discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dexter, R. H. Epstein, R. L. Elgart, and J. Ledolter
Forecasting and Perception of Average and Latest Hours Worked by On-Call Anesthesiologists
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2009;
109(4):
1246 - 1252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Masursky, F. Dexter, M. P. Garver, and N. A. Nussmeier
Incentive Payments to Academic Anesthesiologists for Late Afternoon Work Did Not Influence Turnover Times
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2009;
108(5):
1622 - 1626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Abouleish
Productivity-Based Compensations Versus Incentive Plans
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2008;
107(6):
1765 - 1767.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Rose, C. M. Burkle, and B. A. Elliott
Trends in Gender Distribution Among Anesthesiology Residents: Do They Matter?
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2006;
103(5):
1209 - 1212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Escobar, E. A. Davis, J. Ehrenwerth, G. A. Watrous, G. S. Fisch, Z. N. Kain, and P. G. Barash
Task Analysis of the Preincision Surgical Period: An Independent Observer-Based Study of 1558 Cases
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2006;
103(4):
922 - 927.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Davis, A. Escobar, J. Ehrenwerth, G. A. Watrous, G. S. Fisch, Z. N. Kain, and P. G. Barash
Resident Teaching Versus the Operating Room Schedule: An Independent Observer-Based Study of 1558 Cases
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2006;
103(4):
932 - 937.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Miller
Unintended Consequences? Unanswered Questions?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2006;
102(6):
1909 - 1910.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Abouleish, D. S. Prough, and D. A. Lubarsky
Unintended consequences? Unanswered questions?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2006;
102(6):
1908 - 1909.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Miller and N. H. Cohen
Faculty Incentive Plans: Clinical or Academic Productivity or Both?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2006;
102(3):
969 - 970.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Mets and K. Eckerd
Faculty incentive plans: clinical or academic productivity or both?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2006;
102(3):
968 - 969.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|