JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olegård, C. Articles by Stenqvist, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Olegård, C. Articles by Stenqvist, O.

---

CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

Estimation of Functional Residual Capacity at the Bedside Using Standard Monitoring Equipment: A Modified Nitrogen Washout/Washin Technique Requiring a Small Change of the Inspired Oxygen Fraction

Cecilia Olegård, MD^*, Sören Söndergaard, MD, PhD^*, Erik Houltz, MD, PhD, Stefan Lundin, MD, PhD^*, and Ola Stenqvist, MD, PhD^*

*Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and Department of Thoracic Anesthesiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ola Stenqvist, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden. Address e-mail to ola.stenqvist{at}aniv.gu.se.

We developed a modified nitrogen washin/washout technique based on standard monitors using inspiratory and end-tidal gas concentration values for functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). For validation we used an oxygen-consuming lung model ventilated with an inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio₂) between 0.3 and 1.0. The respiratory quotient of the lung model was varied between 0.7 and 1.0. Measurements were performed changing Fio₂ with fractions of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. In 28 patients with ARF, duplicate measurements were performed. In the lung model, an Fio₂ change of 0.1 resulted in a value of 103 ± 5% of the reference FRC value of the lung model, and the precision was equally good up to an Fio₂ of 1.0 with a value of 103 ± 7%. In the patients, duplicate measurements showed a bias of –5 mL with a 95% confidence interval [–38; 29 mL ]. A comparison of a change in Fio₂ of 0.1 with 0.3 showed a bias of –9 mL and limits of agreement of [–365; 347 mL]. This study shows good precision of FRC measurements with standard monitors using a change in Fio₂ of only 0.1. Measurements can be performed with equal precision up to an Fio₂ of 1.0.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Heinze, B. Sedemund-Adib, M. Heringlake, U. W. Gosch, and W. Eichler Functional Residual Capacity Changes After Different Endotracheal Suctioning Methods Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 941 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Heinze, B. Sedemund-Adib, M. Heringlake, U. W. Gosch, H. Gehring, and W. Eichler The Impact of Different Step Changes of Inspiratory Fraction of Oxygen on Functional Residual Capacity Measurements Using the Oxygen Washout Technique in Ventilated Patients Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1491 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Heinze, B. Schaaf, J. Grefer, K. Klotz, and W. Eichler The Accuracy of the Oxygen Washout Technique for Functional Residual Capacity Assessment During Spontaneous Breathing Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 598 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Taha, M. El-Khatib, S. Siddik-Sayyid, C. Dagher, J.-M. Chehade, and A. Baraka Preoxygenation with the Mapleson D system requires higher oxygen flows than Mapleson A or circle systems: [La preoxygenation avec le systeme Mapleson D requiert un debit d'oxygene plus eleve que les systemes Mapleson A ou en cercle] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2007; 54(2): 141 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999