JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blike, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blike, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, J.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:48-58
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000152614.57997.6C


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

A Method for Measuring System Safety and Latent Errors Associated with Pediatric Procedural Sedation

George T. Blike, MD, Klaus Christoffersen, PhD, Joseph P. Cravero, MD, Steven K. Andeweg, MD, and Jens Jensen, MS

Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire

Address correspondence and reprint requests to George T. Blike, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, NH 03756. Address e-mail to George.Blike{at}hitchcock.org.

The practice of sedating patients in the hospital for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures may be associated with life-threatening respiratory depression. We describe a method that uses a simulated event to identify latent system failures. A simulated scenario was developed that was reproducible with realistic physiology that degraded over time if no interventions occurred and improved when treated appropriately. Management of the scenario was observed in an ideal setting, a radiology department, and an emergency department. Event management was videotaped. The simulator’s physiological data were saved automatically at 5-s intervals. Deviations from "best practice" were measured by using a set of video markers for event detection, diagnosis, and treatment. The simulator data files were used to calculate time out of range for critical variables. Hypoxia and hypotension lasted 4.5 and 5.5 min in the radiology and emergency departments, respectively, compared with 0 min in the gold standard setting. Many latent failures were identified by reviewing the video. This study supports the feasibility of using available human simulation as a crash-test dummy to more objectively quantify rescue system performance in actual sedation care settings. This method revealed vulnerabilities in personnel and in care systems even though sedation care regulatory requirements were met.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Eich, A. Timmermann, S. G. Russo, E. A. Nickel, J. McFadzean, D. Rowney, and S. K. W. Schwarz
Simulator-based training in paediatric anaesthesia and emergency medicine - Thrills, skills and attitudes
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 417 - 419.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
R. D. Valley
Measuring Pediatric Sedation Safety
AAP Grand Rounds, November 1, 2005; 14(5): 53 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.