JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cappelleri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cappelleri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:77-82
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155265.79673.56


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Gianluca Cappelleri, MD*, Giorgio Aldegheri, MD*, Giorgio Danelli, MD{dagger}, Chiara Marchetti, MD*, Massimiliano Nuzzi, MD{dagger}, Gabriella Iannandrea, MD{dagger}, and Andrea Casati, MD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, University of Parma, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Parma, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gianluca Cappelleri, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS H San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy. Address e-mail to cappelleri.gianluca{at}hsr.it.

To compare unilateral spinal block produced with small doses of hyperbaric ropivacaine with that produced by 2 doses of hyperbaric levobupivacaine, we randomly allocated 91 ASA physical status I–II outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy to receive unilateral spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5% (group Ropi-7.5, n = 31) or either 7.5 mg (group Levo-7.5, n = 30) or 5 mg (group Levo-5, n = 30) of hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5%. Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. The lateral decubitus position was maintained for 15 min after injection. Strictly unilateral sensory block was present in 73%, 50%, and 61% of cases in groups Ropi-7.5, Levo-7.5, and Levo-5, respectively, 30 min after injection (P = 0.40), and unilateral motor block was observed in 94%, 93%, and 83% in groups Ropi-7.5, Levo-7.5, and Levo-5, respectively (P = 0.31). One patient of group Ropi-7.5 required general anesthesia to complete surgery, and fentanyl supplementation was required in one patient of group Ropi-7.5 (3%) and one patient of group Levo-5 (3%) (P = 0.42). The median (range) time for spinal block resolution was shorter in group Ropi-7.5 (135 [126–154] min] than in group Levo-7.5 (162 [148–201] min) (P = 0.04); whereas home discharge was shorter in groups Ropi-7.5 (197 [177–218] min) and Levo-5 (197 [187–251] min) as compared with group Levo-7.5 (238 [219–277] min) (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). We conclude that 7.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine provide adequate spinal block for outpatient knee arthroscopy, with a faster home discharge as compared with 7.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, G. Danelli, M. Berti, D. Ghisi, M. Brivio, M. Putzu, and A. Barbagallo
Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Preservative-Free 2-Chlorprocaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 959 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
I. T. Awad and F. Chung
Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery: [Les facteurs influencant la recuperation et la sortie apres une operation en chirurgie ambulatoire].
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 858 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.