JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavlin, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roesen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavlin, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roesen, K.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:83-89
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155958.13748.03


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Perioperative Rofecoxib Plus Local Anesthetic Field Block Diminishes Pain and Recovery Time After Outpatient Inguinal Hernia Repair

Dorothy J. Pavlin, MD, Edward G. Pavlin, MD, Karen D. Horvath, MD, Laurie B. Amundsen, MD, David R. Flum, MD, MPH, and Kristine Roesen, BA

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Address correspondence to Dorothy J. Pavlin, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356540, Seattle, WA 98195. Address e-mail to jpavlin{at}u.washington.edu.

In this study, we compared pain scores after inguinal herniorrhaphy in patients treated by preincisional local anesthetic field block (PL), or PL combined with perioperative rofecoxib, with controls who received standard care. Seventy-five patients having herniorrhaphy under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive a placebo pill preoperatively, and for 5 days postoperatively (CONT); preoperative bupivacaine field block and perioperative placebo (PL); preoperative field block plus rofecoxib, 50 mg preoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively (PLR). Bupivacaine infiltration in the wound at closure, IV fentanyl and acetaminophen/oxycodone were administered postoperatively to all. Discharge time, pain scores (0–10), analgesic use, and satisfaction scores (1–6) were compared using analysis of variance. PLR patients had lower maximum pain scores (worst pain) in the postanesthesia care unit (3.7 versus 5.3, P = 0.02) and at 24 h (5.3 versus 6.8, P = 0.03), were discharged 38 min sooner (P = 0.01), required 28% less oxycodone 0–24 h after discharge (P = 0.04), and reported higher satisfaction scores compared with CONT. Pain in PL was less than CONT for 30 min. There were no differences among the 3 groups after 24 h postoperatively. We conclude that perioperative rofecoxib with PL reduces in-hospital recovery time, decreases pain scores and opioid use, and improves satisfaction scores in the first 24 h after surgery.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.