| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||





*Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA;
Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Triemli City Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; and
Department of Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Christoph K. Hofer, MD, DEAA, Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland. Address e-mail to Christoph.hofer{at}triemli.stzh.ch.
The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called aprotinin-insensitive ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U · mL1), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU · mL1), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringers solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% ± 37% (2 U · mL1) and 24% ± 18% (3 U · mL1), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Ganter and C. K. Hofer Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1366 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Coleman, V. T. Rigali, J. Hammond, J. Kluger, K. W. Jeleniowski, and C. M. White Evaluating the safety implications of aprotinin use: The Retrospective Evaluation of Aprotinin in Cardio Thoracic Surgery (REACTS) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1547 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Ganter, A. Monn, R. Tavakoli, M. Genoni, R. Klaghofer, L. Furrer, H. Honegger, and C. K. Hofer Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 278 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|