This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Udesky, J. O. Articles by Flood, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Udesky, J. O. Articles by Flood, P. Related Collections Pharmacology

---

ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Role of Nicotinic Inhibition in Ketamine-Induced Behavior

Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Pamela Flood, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032. Address e-mail to pdf3{at}columbia.edu.

Several anesthetic drugs are nicotinic antagonists at or below levels used for anesthesia, including ketamine and volatile anesthetics. In contrast, propofol does not inhibit nicotinic receptors. To determine the potential behavioral ramifications of nicotinic inhibition by ketamine, we determined the doses of ketamine required to induce immobility, impair the righting reflex, and cause analgesia in the absence and presence of several nicotinic ligands. Propofol was used as a control in similar experiments. When used as a sole anesthetic drug, 383 ± 22 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneally (IP) was required for immobility and 180 ± 17 mg/kg IP impaired righting reflex. Propofol, 371 ± 34 mg/kg IP, induced immobility whereas 199 mg/kg IP inhibited the righting reflex. Nicotinic antagonists had no effect on the dose of propofol or ketamine required for either end-point. When nociceptive responses were tested at subhypnotic doses, no pronociceptive or antinociceptive phase was identified for propofol, whereas analgesia was induced at ketamine doses larger than 60 mg/kg IP. The broad-spectrum nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine enhanced the analgesic action of ketamine. These findings are different than those seen with volatile anesthetics, where nicotinic inhibition is thought to be responsible for a pronociceptive action. Such a phase is possibly obscured by analgesia induced as a result of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid antagonism by ketamine.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Cheng, J. Yeh, and P. Flood Anesthesia Matters: Patients Anesthetized with Propofol Have Less Postoperative Pain than Those Anesthetized with Isoflurane Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 264 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]