Anesth Analg 2005;101:412-418
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154196.86587.35
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
ß3-Containing Gamma-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Are Not Major Targets for the Amnesic and Immobilizing Actions of Isoflurane
Mark Liao, BS*,
James M. Sonner, MD*,
Rachel Jurd, PhD ,
Uwe Rudolph, MD ,
Cecilia M. Borghese, PhD ,
R. Adron Harris, PhD ,
Michael J. Laster, DVM*, and
Edmond I. Eger, II, MD*
*Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California; Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; and Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Edmond I Eger II, Department of Anesthesia, S-455, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to egere{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu.
Mice bearing an N265M point mutation in the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor ß3 subunit resist various anesthetic effects of propofol and etomidate. They also require a 16% larger concentration of enflurane and a 21% larger concentration of halothane to abolish the withdrawal reflex than do wild-type mice. Using a Pavlovian test, we measured whether this mutation increased the concentration of isoflurane required to impair learning and memory relative to wild-type mice. We found that the concentration was not significantly increased. We also measured MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration required to eliminate movement in response to noxious stimulation in 50% of subjects). Isoflurane MAC for mutant mice (1.93% ± 0.0.03%; mean ± se; n = 14) was 17.0% larger than MAC for wild-type mice (1.65 ± 0.04; n = 14; P < 0.001). Similarly, the cyclopropane MAC for mutant mice (27.6% ± 0.55%; n = 16) was 13.6% larger than MAC for wild-type mice (24.3 ± 0.46; n = 8; P < 0.01). The increase in MAC for cyclopropane was unexpected, because published reports find only minimal actions at 1ß2 2 GABAA receptors whereas isoflurane provides a large enhancement. Consistent with previous work on 1ß2 2 GABAA receptors, we found in Xenopus oocytes that 5 MAC cyclopropane enhanced the effect of GABA on 1ß2 2 GABAA receptors by only 76%, and by a nearly identical enhancement in 1ß3 2, and 6ß3 2 receptors. In contrast, a much smaller concentration of isoflurane (1 MAC) produced a 160% to 310% enhancement in these receptors. If, relative to isoflurane, cyclopropane minimally increases GABA-induced chloride currents at any GABAA receptor subtype, the present data for MAC are consistent with the notion that GABAA receptors do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Hemmings Jr.
Sodium channels and the synaptic mechanisms of inhaled anaesthetics
Br. J. Anaesth.,
July 1, 2009;
103(1):
61 - 69.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2008;
107(3):
832 - 848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Yao, J. Kim, R. Atherley, S. L. Jinks, E. Carstens, S. Shargh, A. Sulger, and J. F. Antognini
The Effects of Aromatic Anesthetics on Dorsal Horn Neuronal Responses to Noxious Stimulation
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2008;
106(6):
1759 - 1764.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xie, B. E. Herring, and A. P. Fox
Excitatory and Inhibitory Actions of Isoflurane in Bovine Chromaffin Cells
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2006;
96(6):
3042 - 3050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Grasshoff and B. Antkowiak
Effects of isoflurane and enflurane on GABAA and glycine receptors contribute equally to depressant actions on spinal ventral horn neurones in rats
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2006;
97(5):
687 - 694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tanifuji, Y. Zhang, M. Liao, E. I. Eger II, M. J. Laster, and J. M. Sonner
Do Dopamine Receptors Mediate Part of MAC?
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2006;
103(5):
1177 - 1181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|