Anesth Analg 2005;101:465-473
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154536.34258.A8
ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Validation of Statistical Methods to Compare Cancellation Rates on the Day of Surgery
Franklin Dexter, MD, PhD* ,
Eric Marcon, PhD ,
Richard H. Epstein, MD||, and
Johannes Ledolter, PhD
*Division of Management Consulting and Departments of Anesthesia and Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City; Department of Industrial Maintenance, Jean Monnet University, Roanne Cedex, France; and ||Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Franklin Dexter, Anesthesia 6-JCP, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. Address e-mail to franklin-dexter{at}uiowa.edu.
We investigated the validity of several statistical methods to monitor the cancellation of electively scheduled cases on the day of surgery: 2 test, Fishers exact test, Rao and Scott test, Students t-test, Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals, and Chen and Tipping modification of the Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. Discrete-event computer simulation over many years was used to represent surgical suites with an unchanging cancellation rate. Because the true cancellation rate was fixed, the accuracy of the statistical methods could be determined. Cancellations caused by medical events, rare events, cases lasting longer than scheduled, and full postanesthesia or intensive care unit beds were modeled. We found that applying Students two-sample t-test to the transformation of the numbers of cases and canceled cases from each of six 4-wk periods was valid for most conditions. We recommend that clinicians and managers use this method in their quality monitoring reports. The other methods gave inaccurate results. For example, using 2 or Fishers exact test, hospitals may erroneously determine that cancellation rates have increased when they really are unchanged. Conversely, if inappropriate statistical methods are used, administrators may claim success at reducing cancellation rates when, in fact, the problem remains unresolved, affecting patients and clinicians.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dexter, E. Marcon, J. Aker, and R. H. Epstein
Numbers of Simultaneous Turnovers Calculated from Anesthesia or Operating Room Information Management System Data
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2009;
109(3):
900 - 905.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Seim, T. Fagerhaug, S. M. Ryen, P. Curran, O. D. Saether, H. O. Myhre, and W. S. Sandberg
Causes of Cancellations on the Day of Surgery at Two Major University Hospitals
Surgical Innovation,
June 1, 2009;
16(2):
173 - 180.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Wachtel and F. Dexter
Influence of the Operating Room Schedule on Tardiness from Scheduled Start Times
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2009;
108(6):
1889 - 1901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Wachtel and F. Dexter
Reducing Tardiness from Scheduled Start Times by Making Adjustments to the Operating Room Schedule
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2009;
108(6):
1902 - 1909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dexter, R. H. Epstein, J. D. Lee, and J. Ledolter
Automatic Updating of Times Remaining in Surgical Cases Using Bayesian Analysis of Historical Case Duration Data and "Instant Messaging" Updates from Anesthesia Providers
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2009;
108(3):
929 - 940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Epstein, F. Dexter, and E. Piotrowski
Automated Correction of Room Location Errors in Anesthesia Information Management Systems
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2008;
107(3):
965 - 971.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dexter, Y. Xiao, A. J. Dow, M. M. Strader, D. Ho, and R. E. Wachtel
Coordination of Appointments for Anesthesia Care Outside of Operating Rooms Using an Enterprise-Wide Scheduling System
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2007;
105(6):
1701 - 1710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|