JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vila, H. Articles by Miguel, R. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vila, H., Jr Articles by Miguel, R. V. Related Collections Pain Economics and Health Care Research

---

ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

The Efficacy and Safety of Pain Management Before and After Implementation of Hospital-Wide Pain Management Standards: Is Patient Safety Compromised by Treatment Based Solely on Numerical Pain Ratings?

Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Department of Performance Improvement, Biostatistics and Informatics Core, Palliative Care, The H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, A National Cancer Institute; and the Department of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Hector Vila, Jr., MD, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612–9497. Address e-mail to vilah{at}moffitt.usf.edu

Inadequate analgesia in hospitalized patients prompted the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations in 2001 to introduce standards that require pain assessment and treatment. In response, many institutions implemented treatment guided by patient reports of pain intensity indexed with a numerical scale. Patient safety associated with treatment of pain guided by a numerical pain treatment algorithm (NPTA) has not been examined. We reviewed patient satisfaction with pain control and opioid-related adverse drug reactions before and after implementation of our NPTA. Patient satisfaction with pain management, measured on a 1–5 scale, significantly improved from 4.13 to 4.38 (P < 0.001) after implementation of an NPTA. The incidence of opioid over sedation adverse drug reactions per 100,000 inpatient hospital days increased from 11.0 pre-NPTA to 24.5 post-NPTA (P < 0.001). Of these patients, 94% had a documented decrease in their level of consciousness preceding the event. Although there was an improvement in patient satisfaction, we experienced a more than two-fold increase in the incidence of opioid over sedation adverse drug reactions in our hospital after the implementation of NPTA. Most adverse drug reactions were preceded by a documented decrease in the patient's level of consciousness, which emphasizes the importance of clinical assessment in managing pain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Voepel-Lewis, A. Marinkovic, A. Kostrzewa, A. R. Tait, and S. Malviya The Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Children Receiving Patient-Controlled Analgesia by Proxy or Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Surgery Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Weber, V. L. Ghafoor, and P. Phelps Implementation of standard order sets for patient-controlled analgesia Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2008; 65(12): 1184 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F. White Pain management after ambulatory surgery - Where is the disconnect?/La prise en charge de la douleur apres une chirurgie ambulatoire : ou est-ce que ca coince ? Can J Anesth, April 1, 2008; 55(4): 201 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Overdyk, R. Carter, R. R. Maddox, J. Callura, A. E. Herrin, and C. Henriquez Continuous Oximetry/Capnometry Monitoring Reveals Frequent Desaturation and Bradypnea During Patient-Controlled Analgesia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F. White and H. Kehlet Improving Pain Management: Are We Jumping from the Frying Pan into the Fire? Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 10 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Brennan, D. B. Carr, and M. Cousins Pain Management: A Fundamental Human Right Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 205 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Reuben and A. Buvanendran Preventing the Development of Chronic Pain After Orthopaedic Surgery with Preventive Multimodal Analgesic Techniques J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1343 - 1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Kozol and A. Voytovich Misinterpretation of the Fifth Vital Sign Arch Surg, May 1, 2007; 142(5): 417 - 419. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Overdyk, R. Carter, and R. Maddox New JCAHO Pain Standard Bigger Threat to Patient Safety Than Envisioned. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1596 - 1596. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Vila Jr and J. B. Downs New JCAHO Pain Standard Bigger Threat to Patient Safety Than Envisioned Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1596 - 1597. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Finley Evaluation of adverse outcomes requires the correct denominator. Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1288 - 1288. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999