Anesth Analg 2005;101:622-628
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000175214.38450.91
CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Predictors of Hypotension After Induction of General Anesthesia
David L. Reich, MD,
Sabera Hossain, MA,
Marina Krol, PhD,
Bernard Baez, MD,
Puja Patel,
Ariel Bernstein, and
Carol A. Bodian, DrPH
Departments of Anesthesiology and Biomathematical Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Address correspondence and reprint requests to David L. Reich, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Box 1010, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 100296574. Address electronic mail to david.reich{at}msnyuhealth.org.
Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia is a common event. In the current investigation, we sought to identify the predictors of clinically significant hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia. Computerized anesthesia records of 4096 patients undergoing general anesthesia were queried for arterial blood pressure (BP), demographic information, preoperative drug history, and anesthetic induction regimen. The median BP was determined preinduction and for 05 and 510 min postinduction of anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as either: mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decrease of >40% and MAP <70 mm Hg or MAP <60 mm Hg. Overall, 9% of patients experienced severe hypotension 010 min postinduction of general anesthesia. Hypotension was more prevalent in the second half of the 010 min interval after anesthetic induction (P < 0.001). In 2406 patients with retrievable outcome data, prolonged postoperative stay and/or death was more common in patients with versus those without postinduction hypotension (13.3% and 8.6%, respectively, multivariate P < 0.02). Statistically significant multivariate predictors of hypotension 010 min after anesthetic induction included: ASA IIIV, baseline MAP <70 mm Hg, age 50 yr, the use of propofol for induction of anesthesia, and increasing induction dosage of fentanyl. Smaller doses of propofol, etomidate, and thiopental were not associated with less hypotension. To avoid severe hypotension, alternatives to propofol anesthetic induction (e.g., etomidate) should be considered in patients older than 50 yr of age with ASA physical status 3. We conclude that it is advisable to avoid propofol induction in patients who present with baseline MAP <70 mm Hg.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G Schoffmann, P Winter, R Palme, A Pollak, G Trittenwein, and J Golej
Haemodynamic changes and stress responses of piglets to surgery during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl
Lab Anim,
July 1, 2009;
43(3):
243 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. S. Gragasin and S. T. Davidge
The effects of propofol on vascular function in mesenteric arteries of the aging rat
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
July 1, 2009;
297(1):
H466 - H474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Boutonnet, S. Ausset, E. Lambert, G. de Saint Maurice, Y. Auroy, H. Berbari, and B. Lenoir
Acute Myocardial Ischemia After Perioperative Beta-Blocking
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2009;
108(5):
1718 - 1720.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Vigoda, L. I. Rodriguez, E. Wu, K. Perry, R. Duncan, D. J. Birnbach, and D. A. Lubarsky
The Use of an Anesthesia Information System to Identify and Trend Gender Disparities in Outpatient Medical Management of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2008;
107(1):
185 - 192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Levy and N. F. Adkinson Jr
Anaphylaxis During Cardiac Surgery: Implications for Clinicians
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2008;
106(2):
392 - 403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Reich and G. W. Fischer
Perioperative Interventions to Modify Risk of Morbidity and Mortality
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
September 1, 2007;
11(3):
224 - 230.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Walz, M. Zayaruzny, and S. O. Heard
Airway Management in Critical Illness
Chest,
February 1, 2007;
131(2):
608 - 620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Hill, B. O. Ogunnaike, and E. R. Johnson
General anaesthesia for the cocaine abusing patient. Is it safe?
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2006;
97(5):
654 - 657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bloomfield and D. W. Noble
Etomidate and fatal outcome--even a single bolus dose may be detrimental for some patients.
Br. J. Anaesth.,
July 1, 2006;
97(1):
116 - 117.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Luce, Y. Auroy, and D. Benhamou
What Good are Large Databases of Intraoperative Data?
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2006;
103(1):
251 - 252.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Reich, S. Hossain, and C. A. Bodian
What Good are Large Databases of Intraoperative Data?
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2006;
103(1):
252 - 252.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Lippmann and C. Kakazu
Hemodynamics with Propofol: Is Propofol Dangerous in Classes III-V Patients?
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2006;
103(1):
260 - 260.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hanss, P. H. Tonner, J. Scholz, and B. Bein
Heart rate variability as a promising tool to predict hypotension.
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2006;
103(1):
264 - 264.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Lim and P. Ellahee
Recommendations for postinduction hypotension: are they supported by the evidence?
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2006;
102(5):
1589 - 1590.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. Tremper
Anesthesia Information Systems: Developing the Physiologic Phenotype Database
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2005;
101(3):
620 - 621.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|