Anesth Analg 2005;101:886-890
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159168.69934.CC
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Block
Geneviève Arcand, MD*,
Stephan R. Williams, MD, PhD, FRCPC*,
Philippe Chouinard, MD, FRCPC*,
Daniel Boudreault, MD, FRCPC*,
Patrick Harris, MD, FRCSC ,
Monique Ruel, RN, CCRP*, and
François Girard, MD, FRCPC*
Departments of *Anesthesiology and Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Canada
Address correspondence to Stephan Williams, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesiology, CHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke east, Montreal, Canada, H2L 4M1. Address e-mail to stephan.williams{at}umontreal.ca.
In this prospective study we compared ultrasound-guided (USG) infraclavicular and supraclavicular blocks for performance time and quality of block. We hypothesized that the infraclavicular approach would result in shorter performance times with a quality of block similar to that of the supraclavicular approach. Eighty patients were randomized into two equal groups: Group I (infraclavicular) and Group S (supraclavicular). All blocks were performed using ultrasound visualization with a 7.5-MHz linear probe and neurostimulation. The anesthetic mixture consisted of 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine hydrocarbonate 2% (1:3 vol.) with epinephrine 1:200,000. Sensory block, motor block, and supplementation rates were evaluated for the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerves. Surgical anesthesia without supplementation was achieved in 80% of patients in group I compared with 87% in Group S (P = 0.39). Supplementation rates were significantly different only for the radial territory: 18% in Group I versus 0% in group S (P = 0.006). Block performance times were not different between groups (4.0 min in Group I versus 4.65 min in Group S; P = 0.43). Technique-related pain scores were not different between groups (I: 2.0; S: 2.0; P = 1.00). We conclude that USG infraclavicular block is at least as rapidly executed as USG supraclavicular block and produces a similar degree of surgical anesthesia without supplementation.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-C. Desgagnes, S. Levesque, N. Dion, M.-J. Nadeau, D. Cote, J. Brassard, P. C. Nicole, and A. F. Turgeon
A Comparison of a Single or Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2009;
109(2):
668 - 672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dingemans, S. R. Williams, G. Arcand, P. Chouinard, P. Harris, M. Ruel, and F. Girard
Neurostimulation in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2007;
104(5):
1275 - 1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Q. H. Tran, R. Charghi, and R. J. Finlayson
The "Double Bubble" Sign for Successful Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2006;
103(4):
1048 - 1049.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|