JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turkstra, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turkstra, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gelb, A. W.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:910-915
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27


GENERAL ARTICLES

Cervical Spine Motion: A Fluoroscopic Comparison During Intubation with Lighted Stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope

Timothy P. Turkstra, M Eng, P Eng, MD*, Rosemary A. Craen, MB, BS, FRCPC, FANZCA*, David M. Pelz, MD, FRCPC{dagger}, and Adrian W. Gelb, MB, ChB, FRCPC, FRCA*

Department of *Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine and {dagger}Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to T. Turkstra, MD, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Rd., London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5. Address e-mail to tturkstra{at}uwo.ca.

The question of which is the optimum technique to intubate the trachea in a patient who may have a cervical(C)-spine injury remains unresolved. We compared, using fluoroscopic video, C-spine motion during intubation for Macintosh 3 blade, GlideScope®, and Intubating Lighted Stylet, popularly known as the Lightwand or Trachlight®. Thirty-six healthy patients were randomized to participate in a crossover trial of either Lightwand or GlideScope to Macintosh laryngoscopy, with in-line stabilization. C-spine motion was examined at the Occiput-C1 junction, C1-2 junction, C2-5 motion segment, and C5-thoracic motion segment during manual ventilation via bag-mask, laryngoscopy, and intubation. Time to intubate was also measured. C-spine motion during bag-mask ventilation was 82% less at the four motion segments studied than during Macintosh laryngoscopy (P < 0.001). C-spine motion using the Lightwand was less than during Macintosh laryngoscopy, averaging 57% less at the four motion segments studied (P < 0.03). There was no significant difference in time to intubate between the Lightwand and the Macintosh blade. C-spine motion was reduced 50% at the C2-5 segment using the GlideScope (P < 0.04) but unchanged at the other segments. Laryngoscopy with GlideScope took 62% longer than with the Macintosh blade (P < 0.01). Thus, the Lightwand (Intubating Lighted Stylet) is associated with reduced C-spine movement during endotracheal intubation compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. A. Maktabi, S. S. Titler, S. Kadakia, and R. K. Conway
When Fiberoptic Intubation Fails in Patients with Unstable Craniovertebral Junctions
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1937 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. J. Houde, S. R. Williams, A. Cadrin-Chenevert, F. Guilbert, and P. Drolet
A Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion During Orotracheal Intubation with the Trachlight(R) or the Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1638 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. M. Wong, A. Prabhu, S. Chakraborty, G. Tan, E. M. Massicotte, and R. Cooper
Cervical spine motion during flexible bronchoscopy compared with the Lo-Pro GlideScope(R)
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 424 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Maruyama, T. Yamada, R. Kawakami, and K. Hara
Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 563 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Robitaille, S. R. Williams, M.-H. Tremblay, F. Guilbert, M. Theriault, and P. Drolet
Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation with Manual In-Line Stabilization: Direct Laryngoscopy versus GlideScope(R) Videolaryngoscopy
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 935 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Maruyama, T. Yamada, R. Kawakami, T. Kamata, M. Yokochi, and K. Hara
Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 120 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Lighted Stylet and GlideScope Reduce C-Spine Motion During Intubation
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 25, 2005; 2005(1025): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.