This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lattermann, R. Articles by Gruber, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lattermann, R. Articles by Gruber, M. Related Collections Postanesthetic Care Unit Regional Anesthesia

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

The Anticatabolic Effect of Neuraxial Blockade After Hip Surgery

Ralph Lattermann, MD, MSc^*, Geesche Belohlavek, MD^*, Sigrid Wittmann, MD^*, Bernd Füchtmeier, MD, and Michael Gruber, PhD^*

Departments of *Anesthesia and Trauma Surgery, University of Regensburg, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ralph Lattermann, MD, Department of Anesthesia, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Address e-mail to ralph.lattermann{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de.

Although the protein-sparing effect of neuraxial blockade after abdominal surgery is well established, its metabolic effect after operations on the lower extremities remains unclear. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that combined spinal and epidural blockade (CSE) inhibits amino acid oxidation after hip surgery. Sixteen patients undergoing hip replacement surgery received either general anesthesia followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia with piritramide (control; n = 8) or CSE using bupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia and ropivacaine 0.2% with 0.5 µg/mL of sufentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia (CSE; n = 8). Glucose and protein kinetics were assessed by stable isotope tracer technique ([6,6-²H₂]glucose, L-[1-¹³C]leucine) on the day before and one day after surgery. Plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, free fatty acids, cortisol, glucagon, and insulin were also determined. CSE prevented the increase in plasma glucose concentration during and immediately after the operation (60 min after skin incision: CSE 4.9 ± 0.7 versus control 6.2 ± 0.7 mmol/L; P < 0.05; postanesthesia care unit: CSE 5.0 ± 0.9 versus control 7.3 ± 1.1 mmol/L; P < 0.05). Intraoperative cortisol plasma concentrations were smaller in the CSE group than in the control group. One day after the operation, however, glucose plasma concentration, glucose production, and glucose clearance were comparable in both groups. CSE inhibited the postoperative increase in leucine oxidation rate (CSE 30 ± 12 versus control 43 ± 8 µmol·kg^–1·h^–1; P < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in protein breakdown, whole body protein synthesis, and plasma concentrations of lactate, free fatty acids, insulin, and glucagon. In conclusion, CSE prevents hyperglycemia during hip surgery and inhibits protein catabolism thereafter.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Hu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Y.-Q. Hua, J. Li, and Z.-D. Cai A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: A META-ANALYSIS J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2009; 91-B(7): 935 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]