This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krobbuaban, B. Articles by Tanomsat, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krobbuaban, B. Articles by Tanomsat, M. Related Collections Airway

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

The Predictive Value of the Height Ratio and Thyromental Distance: Four Predictive Tests for Difficult Laryngoscopy

Department of Anesthesiology, Chaiyaphum Hospital, Thailand

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Banjong Krobbuaban, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Chaiyaphum Hospital, Bannakan Road, Muang Chaiyaphum, Thailand. Address e-mail to Albkb{at}diamond.mahidol.ac.th.

Preoperative evaluation of anatomical landmarks and clinical factors help identify potentially difficult laryngoscopies; however, predictive reliability is unclear. Because the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) has a demonstrably better predictive value than the thyromental distance (TMD), we evaluated the predictive value and odds ratios of RHTMD versus mouth opening, TMD, neck movement, and oropharyngeal view (modified Mallampati). We collected data on 550 consecutive patients scheduled for elective-surgery general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation and then assessed all five factors before surgery. An experienced anesthesiologist, not apprised of the recorded preoperative airway assessment, performed the laryngoscopy and grading (as per Cormack and Lehane’s classification). Difficult laryngoscopy (Grade 3 or 4) occurred in 69 patients (12.5%). RHTMD had a higher sensitivity, positive predictive value, and fewer false negatives than the other variables tested. In the multivariate analysis, three criteria were found independent for difficult laryngoscopy (neck movement 80 degrees; Mallampati Class 3 or 4, and RHTMD 23.5). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of the RHTMD, Mallampati class, and neck movement were 6.72 (3.29–13.72), 2.96 (1.63–5.35), and 2.73 (1.14–6.51), respectively. The odds ratio for RHTMD was the largest and thus may prove a useful screening test for difficult laryngoscopy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Varying Accuracy of Difficult-Intubation Predictors Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, January 4, 2006; 2006(104): 5 - 5. [Full Text]