| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||





#
Departments of *Anesthesiology and
Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri;
Outcomes Research Institute and Departments of
Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine and ||Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; ¶Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Vienna General Hospital, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and #Department of Anesthesiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Andrea Kurz, Department of Anesthesiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Address e-mail to andrea.kurz{at}insel.ch. On the worldwide web: www.or.org.
Wound perfusion and oxygenation are important determinants of the development of postoperative wound infections. Supplemental fluid administration significantly increases tissue oxygenation in surrogate wounds in the subcutaneous tissue of the upper arm in perioperative surgical patients. We tested the hypothesis that supplemental fluid administration during and after elective colon resections decreases the incidence of postoperative wound infections. Patients undergoing open colon resection were randomly assigned to small-volume (n = 124, 8 mL · kg1 · h1) or large-volume (n = 129, 1618 mL · kg1 · h1) fluid management. Our major outcomes were two distinct criteria for diagnosis of surgical wound infections: 1) purulent exudate combined with a culture positive for pathogenic bacteria, and 2) Center for Disease Control criteria for diagnosis of surgical wound infections. All wound infections diagnosed using either criterion by a blinded observer in the 15 days after surgery were considered in the analysis. Wound healing was evaluated with the ASEPSIS scoring system. Of the patients given small fluid administration, 14 had surgical wound infections; 11 given large fluid therapy had infections, P = 0.46. ASEPSIS wound-healing scores were similar in both groups: 7 ± 16 (small volume) versus 8 ± 14 (large volume), P = 0.70. Our results suggest that supplemental hydration in the range tested does not impact wound infection rate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Holte, N. B. Foss, J. Andersen, L. Valentiner, C. Lund, P. Bie, and H. Kehlet Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 500 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Holte, B. B. Kristensen, L. Valentiner, N. B. Foss, H. Husted, and H. Kehlet Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Management in Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 465 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tornero-Campello Supplemental Intravenous Crystalloid Administration and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 1040 - 1040. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kabon and D. I. Sessler Supplemental Intravenous Crystalloid Administration and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 1040 - 1041. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|