JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2005;101:1634-1642
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

A Comparison of Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Spencer S. Liu, MD*, Wyndam M. Strodtbeck, MD*, Jeffrey M. Richman, MD{dagger}, and Christopher L. Wu, MD{dagger}

Departments of Anesthesiology, *Virginia Mason Medical Center and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Address correspondence to Spencer S. Liu, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, P.O. Box 900, Mail Stop B2-AN, Seattle, WA 98111. Address electronic mail to anessl{at}vmmc.org.

Both regional anesthesia and general anesthesia have been proposed to provide optimal ambulatory anesthesia. We searched MEDLINE and other databases for randomized controlled trials comparing regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in ambulatory surgery patients for meta-analysis. Only major conduction blocks were considered to be regional anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was further separated into central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block. Fifteen (1003 patients) and 7 (359 patients) trials for central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block were included in the meta-analysis. Both central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block were associated with increased induction time, reduced pain scores, and decreased need for postanesthesia care unit analgesics. However, central neuraxial block was not associated with decreased postanesthesia care unit bypass or time or reduced nausea despite reduced analgesics, and it was associated with a 35-min increase in total ambulatory surgery unit time. In contrast, peripheral nerve block was associated with decreased postanesthesia care unit need and decreased nausea but, again, not with decreased ambulatory surgery unit time. This meta-analysis indicates potential advantages for regional anesthesia, such as decreased postanesthesia care unit use, nausea, and postoperative pain. Although these factors have been proposed to reduce ambulatory surgery unit stay, neither central neuraxial block nor peripheral nerve block were associated with reduced ambulatory surgery unit time. Other factors, such as unsuitable discharge criteria and limitations of meta-analysis, may explain this discrepancy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. D. O'Donnell, H. Ryan, O. O'Sullivan, and G. Iohom
Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block with 20 Milliliters Local Anesthetic Mixture Versus General Anesthesia for Upper Limb Trauma Surgery: An Observer-Blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2009; 109(1): 279 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. A. Williams, Q. Dang, J. E. Bost, J. J. Irrgang, S. L. Orebaugh, M. T. Bottegal, and M. L. Kentor
General Health and Knee Function Outcomes from 7 Days to 12 Weeks After Spinal Anesthesia and Multimodal Analgesia for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1296 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. L. Friedberg
Avoiding Emetogenic Triggers in the First Place Is More Effective than Using Antiemetics
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1921 - 1922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. J. Chamberlin
General Versus Regional: Why Either/Or?
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 1058 - 1059.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
Choice of peripheral nerve block for inguinal herniorrhaphy: is better the enemy of good?
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1073 - 1075.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Hadzic
Is Regional Anesthesia Really Better than General Anesthesia?
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1631 - 1633.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.