JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Zijl, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by James, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Zijl, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by James, M. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Pharmacology
Right arrow Ambulatory

Anesth Analg 2005;101:1651-1655
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184132.94921.D1


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

The Comparative Effects of Remifentanil or Magnesium Sulfate Versus Placebo on Attenuating the Hemodynamic Responses After Electroconvulsive Therapy

Dirk H. van Zijl, MBChB, FCA, Peter C. Gordon, MBChB, BSc, FCA, and Michael F. James, MBChB, FFARCS, PhD

Department of Anaesthesia, Groote Schuur Hospital, Valkenberg Hospital and the University of Cape Town, South Africa

Address correspondence to Dirk van Zijl, MBChB, FCA, Department of Anaesthesia, Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town, Anzio Road Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. Address e-mail to dirkath{at}mweb.co.za.

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study we compared the effects of remifentanil or magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) versus placebo in attenuating the sympathetic response to electroconvulsive therapy. Twenty adults underwent a total of 115 anesthetics for therapeutic electroconvulsive therapy. Patients were randomly allocated twice into each of the three test groups: placebo control, MgSO4 30 mg/kg, or remifentanil 1.0 µg/kg. Systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures, heart rate, and oxygen saturations were recorded before IV access was established. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg. The trial drug was then administered and neuromuscular blockade was followed with succinylcholine 0.5 mg/kg before electroconvulsive therapy was performed. All measurements were repeated at 0, 1, 3 and 10 min after the seizure ended. Remifentanil and MgSO4 produced a statistically significant attenuation of the increase in systolic arterial blood pressure at 0, 1, and 3 min (P < 0.05). Remifentanil, but not MgSO4 or placebo, attenuated the increase in heart rate at 1 and 3 min but not the peak rate. Remifentanil increased the duration of apnea (mean 90 s), with no other adverse respiratory effects. Mean seizure duration time was 33 (± 14) s, with no difference among the groups. In conclusion, remifentanil 1.0 µg/kg and MgSO4 30 mg/kg attenuated the systolic arterial blood pressure response to electroconvulsive therapy without reducing the duration of seizure activity. Because MgSO4 has less effect on HR, it might offer advantages over remifentanil in patients at risk for post-electroconvulsive therapy bradycardia.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.