Anesth Analg 2005;101:1663-1676
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184187.02887.24
AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA
Peripheral Nerve Block Techniques for Ambulatory Surgery
Stephen M. Klein, MD,
Holly Evans, MD, FRCP(C),
Karen C. Nielsen, MD,
Marcy S. Tucker, MD, PhD,
David S. Warner, MD, and
Susan M. Steele, MD
Division of Ambulatory Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stephen M. Klein, MD Department of Anesthesiology, Box 3094 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to klein006{at}mc.duke.edu.
Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have an increasingly important role in ambulatory anesthesia and have many characteristics of the ideal outpatient anesthetic: surgical anesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and facilitated discharge. Critically evaluating the potential benefits and supporting evidence is essential to appropriate technique selection. When PNBs are used for upper extremity procedures, there is consistent opioid sparing and fewer treatment-related side effects when compared with general anesthesia. This has been demonstrated in the immediate perioperative period but has not been extensively investigated after discharge. Lower extremity PNBs are particularly useful for procedures resulting in greater tissue trauma when the benefits of dense analgesia appear to be magnified, as evidenced by less hospital readmission. The majority of current studies do not support the concept that a patient will have difficulty coping with pain when their block resolves at home. Initial investigations of outpatient continuous peripheral nerve blocks demonstrate analgesic potential beyond that obtained with single-injection blocks and offer promise for extending the duration of postoperative analgesia. The encouraging results of these studies will have to be balanced with the resources needed to safely manage catheters at home. Despite supportive data for ambulatory PNBs, most studies have been either case series or relatively small prospective trials, with a narrow focus on analgesia, opioids, and immediate side effects. Ultimately, having larger prospective data with a broader focus on outcome benefits would be more persuasive for anesthesiologists to perform procedures that are still viewed by many as technically challenging.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2007;
104(6):
1380 - 1396.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
