JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kariger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kariger, R.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:160-167
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183668.53139.fc


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

A Comparison of State and Response Entropy Versus Bispectral Index Values During the Perioperative Period

Paul F. White, PhD, MD*, Jun Tang, MD{dagger}, Gladys F. Romero, MD*, Ronald H. Wender, MD{dagger}, Robert Naruse, MD{dagger}, Alexander Sloninsky, MD{dagger}, and Robert Kariger, MD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Paul F. White, Professor and McDermott Chair of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., F2.208A, Dallas, TX 75390-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu.

Cerebral monitoring indices are associated with a large degree of inter-patient variability and electrical signal interference during surgery. We designed this clinical study to test the hypothesis that use of the spectral entropy (Entropy) module is associated with less frequent intraoperative interference with the displayed indices than the bispectral index (BIS) monitor when used during general anesthesia with propofol and desflurane. Thirty consenting patients scheduled for major laparoscopic surgery procedures were enrolled in this prospective study. The elapsed time to obtain a baseline index value was recorded, as well as the simultaneous state entropy (SE), response entropy (RE), and BIS values at specific time intervals during the induction, maintenance, and emergence periods in patients administered a standardized general anesthetic technique. During the maintenance period, the changes in these indices were evaluated after a bolus dose of propofol (20 mg IV) and a 2% increase or decrease in the inspired concentration of desflurane. As expected, the baseline SE values were less than the RE and BIS values (88 ± 2 versus 96 ± 3 and 96 ± 4, respectively). However, the SE and RE values correlated with the BIS value during the induction (r = 0.77 and 0.78, respectively) and emergence (r = 0.86 and 0.91, respectively) periods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of consciousness also indicated a similar performance of the SE (0.93 ± 0.04) relative to the RE (0.98 ± 0.04) and BIS (0.97 ± 0.04). During the maintenance period, the responses to changes in propofol and desflurane concentrations were consistent with all three indices. Finally, the entropy indices were less interfered with by the electrocautery unit during the operation (12% versus 62% for the BIS monitor). Because the average selling prices of the Entropy and BIS disposable electrode strips ($14.25 versus $14.95 USD, respectively) are comparable, we conclude that the Entropy module is a cost-equivalent alternative to the BIS monitor.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Lefoll-Masson, C. Fermanian, I. Aime, N. Verroust, G. Taylor, P.-A. Laloe, N. Liu, P. Aegerter, and M. Fischler
The Comparability of Bispectral Index and State Entropy Index During Maintenance of Sufentanil-Sevoflurane-Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1319 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Vassiliadis, D. Geros, and K. Maria
Awareness Despite Low Spectral Entropy Values
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 535 - 535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
V. Bonhomme, E. Deflandre, and P. Hans
Correlation and agreement between bispectral index and state entropy of the electroencephalogram during propofol anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. E. Anderson and J. G. Jakobsson
Cerebral state index: comparison between pairwise registrations from the left and the right sides of the brain
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 347 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.