JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hohlrieder, M.
Right arrow Articles by von Goedecke, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hohlrieder, M.
Right arrow Articles by von Goedecke, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2006;102:319-321
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180768.81020.C4


GENERAL ARTICLES

Middle Ear Pressure Changes During Anesthesia With or Without Nitrous Oxide are Similar Among Airway Devices

Mathias Hohlrieder, MD*, Christian Keller, MD, MSc*, Joseph Brimacombe, MB, ChB, FRCA, MD{dagger}, Stephan Eschertzhuber, MD*, Günter Luckner, MD*, Irene Abraham, MD{ddagger}, and Achim von Goedecke, MD*

*Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria; {dagger}James Cook University, Cairns Base Hospital, Australia; {ddagger}Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria

Address correspondence to Prof. J. Brimacombe, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia. Address e-mail to jbrimaco{at}bigpond.net.au.

We tested the hypothesis that middle ear pressure (MEP) is influenced by the choice of airway device during anesthesia with or without nitrous oxide (N2O) in the gas mixture. Eighty consecutive anesthetized, paralyzed ventilated patients (ASA physical status I–II, 18–65 yr) were randomly allocated for airway management with the orally inserted tracheal tube, classic laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, or laryngeal tube suction with or without N2O 66% in the gas mixture. MEP was measured from both ears in random order by a blinded observer before induction of anesthesia and every 10 min for 70 min. In the N2O groups, N2O was changed to air after 40 min. There were no differences in MEP among the airway devices in the N2O or air groups. MEP was unchanged in the air groups but increased in the N2O groups with N2O (P < 0.0001) and decreased with air (P < 0.02). Baseline values for MEP were similar, but MEP was always higher for the N2O groups (P < 0.001). We conclude that the choice of airway device does not influence MEP among orally inserted tracheal tube, classic laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, and laryngeal tube suction during anesthesia with or without N2O in the gas mixture.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.