This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galvin, E. M. Articles by Verbrugge, S. J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Galvin, E. M. Articles by Verbrugge, S. J. C.

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Thermographic Temperature Measurement Compared with Pinprick and Cold Sensation in Predicting the Effectiveness of Regional Blocks

Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eilish Galvin, MB, FCARCSI, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Address e-mail to eilishgalvin{at}hotmail.com.

We designed this study to evaluate the usefulness of thermographic temperature measurement with an infrared camera, compared with patient response to cold and pinprick, as a means of assessing the success or failure of axillary blockades. Axillary blocks were performed on 25 patients undergoing surgery on the hand or forearm using a nerve stimulator technique with mepivacaine 1.5%. Pinprick and cold sensation were assessed on the operative site at 5-min intervals for 30 min. A thermographic image of the operative limb was recorded at similar time intervals. Thermographic images of the unblocked limb were taken before block placement and at 30 min. Temperature values at the operative site and unblocked limb were calculated from the thermographic images. Results revealed that thermography had higher combined values for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values than both cold and pinprick at all time intervals, with statistically significant differences at 15 min (thermography versus cold, P = 0.006; thermography versus pinprick, P = 0.026) and 30 min (thermography versus cold, P = 0.038; thermography versus pinprick, P = 0.040). For thermography as a method of block assessment, an optimal time of 15 min after mepivacaine local anesthetic injection gives the highest combined values for predicting a successful block (P = 0.004). We conclude that thermography provides an early and objective assessment of the success and failure of axillary regional blockades.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Minville, A. Gendre, J. Hirsch, S. Silva, B. Bourdet, C. Barbero, O. Fourcade, K. Samii, and H. Bouaziz The Efficacy of Skin Temperature for Block Assessment After Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 1034 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Stevens, R. Werdehausen, H. Hermanns, and P. Lipfert Further Evidence that Temperature Measurement Is a Useful Indicator of Regional Anesthesia Outcomes Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 741 - 742. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Galvin and S. Niehof Further Evidence that Temperature Measurement Is a Useful Indicator of Regional Anesthesia Outcomes Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 740 - 741. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Galvin, S. Niehof, S. J. Verbrugge, I. Maissan, A. Jahn, J. Klein, and J. van Bommel Peripheral flow index is a reliable and early indicator of regional block success. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 239 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]