JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asahi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asahi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, S. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2006;102:772-778
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000196536.60320.f9


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Intravenous Anesthetics Are More Effective than Volatile Anesthetics on Inhibitory Pathways in Rat Hippocampal CA1

Takehisa Asahi, MD*, Koki Hirota, MD, PhD*, Rika Sasaki, MD, PhD*, Yamazaki Mitsuaki, MD, PhD*, and Sheldon H. Roth, PhD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toyama, Japan; and {dagger}Departments of Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Takehisa Asahi, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama-city, Toyama, 930-0194 Japan. Address e-mail to take3260{at}ms.toyama-mpu.ac.jp.

In this study, we have examined the effects of both volatile and IV general anesthetics on excitatory synaptic transmission, with and without recurrent inhibition, to clarify whether excitatory or inhibitory synapses are the major targets of action. Field population spike amplitudes (fPSs) of CA1 pyramidal neurons were recorded in rat hippocampal slices. Schaffer-collateral-commissural fibers (Sch) were stimulated orthodromically, and the evoked fPSs (PS[Sch]) in CA1 area were measured. In addition, the fPSs (PS[Alv+Sch]) elicited by stimulation of the Sch after antidromic stimulation of the alveus hippocampi (Alv) to produce recurrent inhibition were determined. It was observed that sevoflurane (0.5%–5%) and isoflurane (0.5%–5%) primarily inhibited PS[Sch] and also produced additive inhibition on the PS[Alv+Sch] in a concentration-dependent manner. The calculated 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for PS[Sch] and PS[Alv+Sch] were 5.3 vol% and 3.9 vol% (sevoflurane) and 1.7 vol% and 1.1 vol% (isoflurane), respectively. In comparison, thiopental (2.0 x 10–5–5.0 x 10–4 mol/L) reduced both the PS[Sch] and PS[Alv+Sch] in a concentration-dependent manner. The calculated EC50 values for thiopental on PS[Sch] and PS[Alv+Sch] were 3.4 x 10–4 and 5.7 x 10–5 mol/L, respectively. Propofol (2.0 x 10–5–3.5 x 10–4 mol/L) had little effect on the PS[Sch] but reduced PS[Alv+Sch] with a calculated EC50 value of 5.1 x 10–4 mol/L. The effects of the IV anesthetics with recurrent inhibition were antagonized in the presence of the {gamma}-aminobutyric acid-A-receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide. In addition, all anesthetics prolonged recurrent inhibition from 100 ms (sevoflurane and isoflurane) to 400 ms (propofol). The results suggest that sevoflurane and isoflurane inhibit mainly on glutamate-mediated orthodromic pathways, whereas thiopental and propofol enhance {gamma}-aminobutyric acid-A-mediated recurrent inhibitory pathways in CA1 neurons, thus providing further evidence that the mechanisms of general anesthetics are drug- and pathway-specific.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.