This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reinacher, P. C. Articles by Scheufler, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reinacher, P. C. Articles by Scheufler, K. M. Related Collections Neuroanesthesia Monitoring (Non-cardiac) Pharmacology

---

NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

The Effects of Stimulation Pattern and Sevoflurane Concentration on Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potentials

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany; Cranio Facial Center Hislanden, Hislanden Medical Center, Aaran, Switzerland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kai-Michael Scheufler, MD, Abt. Cranio Facial Center Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center CH-500, Aaran, Switzerland. Address e-mail to kai.scheufler{at}hirslanden.ch.

The usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during inhaled anesthesia is limited by the suppressive effects of volatile anesthetics on MEP signals. We investigated the effects of different stimulation patterns and end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane on intraoperative transcranial electrical MEPs. In 12 patients undergoing craniotomy, stimulation patterns (300–500 V, 100–1000 Hz, 1–5 stimuli) and multiples (0.5, 0.75, and 1.0) of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane were varied randomly while remifentanil was administered at a constant rate of 0.2 µg · kg^–1 · min^–1. MEPs were recorded from thenar and hypothenar muscles and analyzed without knowledge of the respective MAC. Three-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for increasing stimulation intensity, frequency, and number of stimuli on MEP amplitude (P < 0.05). Maximum MEP amplitudes and recording success rates were observed during 4 stimuli delivered at 1000 Hz and 300 V. A significant main effect of sevoflurane concentration (0.5 versus 0.75 and 1 MAC multiple) on MEP amplitude was observed at the thenar recording site only (P < 0.05). In conclusion, MEP characteristics varied significantly with changes in stimulation pattern and less so with changes in sevoflurane concentration. The results suggest that high frequency repetitive stimulation allows intraoperative use of MEP monitoring during up to 1 MAC multiple of sevoflurane and constant infusion of remifentanil up to 0.2 µg · kg^–1 · min^–1.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility? Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Yamamoto, M. Kawaguchi, H. Hayashi, T. Horiuchi, S. Inoue, H. Nakase, T. Sakaki, and H. Furuya The Effects of the Neuromuscular Blockade Levels on Amplitudes of Posttetanic Motor-Evoked Potentials and Movement in Response to Transcranial Stimulation in Patients Receiving Propofol and Fentanyl Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 930 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Priebe Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and the anaesthetist Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 102 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]