This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wong, C. A. Articles by McCarthy, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wong, C. A. Articles by McCarthy, R. J. Related Collections Obstetrics Regional Anesthesia Pain

---

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

A Randomized Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus with Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia

Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ilinois

Address correspondence to Cynthia A. Wong, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, 251 E. Huron Street, F5-704, Chicago, IL 60611. Address e-mail to c-wong2{at}northwestern.edu.

Bolus injection through an epidural catheter may result in better distribution of anesthetic solution in the epidural space compared with continuous infusion of the same anesthetic solution. In this randomized, double-blind study we compared total bupivacaine consumption, need for supplemental epidural analgesia, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction in women who received programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) compared with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) for maintenance of labor analgesia. The primary outcome variable was bupivacaine consumption per hour of analgesia. Combined spinal epidural analgesia was initiated in multiparas scheduled for induction of labor with cervical dilation between 2 and 5 cm. Subjects were randomized to PIEB (6-mL bolus every 30 min beginning 45 min after the intrathecal injection) or CEI (12-mL/h infusion beginning 15 min the after the intrathecal injection). The epidural analgesia solution was bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL and fentanyl 2 µg/mL. Breakthrough pain in both groups was treated initially with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) followed by manual bolus rescue analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125%. The median total bupivacaine dose per hour of analgesia was less in the PIEB (n = 63) (10.5 mg/h; 95% confidence interval, 9.5–11.8 mg/h) compared with the CEI group (n = 63) (12.3 mg/h; 95% confidence interval, 10.5–14.0 mg/h) (P < 0.01), fewer manual rescue boluses were required (rate difference 22%, 95% confidence interval of difference 5% to 38%), and satisfaction scores were higher. Labor pain, PCEA requests, and delivered PCEA doses did not differ. PIEB combined with PCEA provided similar analgesia, but with a smaller bupivacaine dose and better patient satisfaction compared with CEI with PCEA for maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. H. Halpern and B. Carvalho Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Taboada, J. Rodriguez, M. Bermudez, C. Valino, B. Ulloa, F. Aneiros, F. Gude, J. Cortes, J. Alvarez, and P. G. Atanassoff A "New" Automated Bolus Technique for Continuous Popliteal Block: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison with a Continuous Infusion Technique Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1433 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Fegley, J. Lerman, and R. Wissler Epidural Multiorifice Catheters Function as Single-Orifice Catheters: An In Vitro Study Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 1079 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. Sia, Y. Lim, and C. Ocampo A Comparison of a Basal Infusion with Automated Mandatory Boluses in Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]