| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vincent Minville, MD, Department of anesthesiology and intensive care, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France. Address e-mail to vincentminville{at}yahoo.fr.
In this prospective randomized study, we compared humeral block (HB) and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) with pain caused by the block as a primary outcome, assuming that ICB would cause less pain than HB. Patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery were included in this study and received either ICB (group I, n = 52 patients) or HB (group H, n = 52 patients). Patients were asked to quantify the severity of the pain during the procedure using a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 mm and to identify which of the 4 components of the procedure was most unpleasant (skin transfixion, needle redirection in search of the nerves, local anesthetic injections, or electrical stimulation). The block was assessed every 5 min for 30 min after completion of the block. Overall visual analog scale scores for the block were 35 ± 27 mm in group H versus 19 ± 18 mm in group I (P < 0.0011). Electrical stimulation was the most unpleasant part of the block (group H, 29 ± 15 mm versus group I, 15 ± 10 mm) (P < 0.019). Time to perform the block was significantly shorter in group I (ICB, 6 ± 4 min versus HB, 10 ± 4 min; P < 0.0001). The onset time was 13 ± 7 min for ICB and 9 ± 3 min for HB (P < 0.05). No serious complications were observed. In summary, ICB is less painful, compared with HB, with a similar success rate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Minville and D. Samson Patient Comfort in Regional Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 349 - 350. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. H. De Tran, A. Clemente, J. Doan, and R. J. Finlayson Brachial plexus blocks: a review of approaches and techniques: [Les blocs du plexus brachial : compte-rendu des approches et techniques] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(8): 662 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Samson, V. Minville, C. Chassery, L. Nguyen, A. Pianezza, O. Fourcade, A. Rabinowitz, and K. Samii Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic (EMLA(R)) Decreases Pain During Humeral Block Placement in Nonsedated Patients Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 512 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Minville, O. Fourcade, B. Bourdet, M. Doherty, C. Chassery, J.-C. Pourrut, C. Gris, B. Eychennes, A. Colombani, K. Samii, et al. The Optimal Motor Response for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 448 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|