Anesth Analg 2006;102:921-929
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000196687.88590.6b
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
The Epidural Test Dose: A Review
Joanne Guay, MD, FRCPC
Department of Anesthesia, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Canada
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Joanne Guay, MD, FRCPC, Clinical Associate Professor, Anesthesia, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415 L'Assomption Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 2M4. Address e-mail to joanne.guay{at}umontreal.ca.
This review systematically examines the literature on the ability of the classical epidural test dose and other strategies to detect intravascular, intrathecal, or subdural epidural needle/catheter misplacement. For detection of simulated intravascular misplacements, a sensitivity (S) and a positive predictive value (PPV) 80 demonstrated by at least two randomized controlled trials coming from two different centers were determined for the following tests and patient populations: Nonpregnant adult patients = increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) 15 mm Hg (S = 80100 and 93100; PPV = 80100 and 83100) or either an increase in SBP 15 mm Hg or an increase in heart rate 10 bpm after the injection of 10 (S = 100; PPV = 83100) or 15 µg of epinephrine (S = 100; PPV = 83100); pregnant patients = sedation, drowsiness, or dizziness within 5 min after the injection of 100 µg of fentanyl (S = 92100; PPV = 9195); and children = increase in SBP 15 mm Hg after the injection of 0.5 µg/kg of epinephrine (S = 81100; PPV = 100). Conversely, more studies are required to determine the best strategies to detect intrathecal and subdural epidural needle/catheter misplacements in these three patient populations.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Mhyre, M. L. V. H. Greenfield, L. C. Tsen, and L. S. Polley
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials That Evaluate Strategies to Avoid Epidural Vein Cannulation During Obstetric Epidural Catheter Placement
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2009;
108(4):
1232 - 1242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|