Anesth Analg 2006;102:1147-1153
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198670.02481.6b
TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION
The Delivery of Drugs to Patients by Continuous Intravenous Infusion: Modeling Predicts Potential Dose Fluctuations Depending on Flow Rates and Infusion System Dead Volume
Mark A. Lovich, MD, PhD*,
M. Ellen Kinnealley, RN ,
Nathanial M. Sims, MD* , and
Robert A. Peterfreund, MD, PhD*
Departments of *Anesthesia and Critical Care and Biomedical Engineering, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark A. Lovich, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114. Address e-mail to mlovich{at}partners.org.
IV drug infusion has the potential for dosing errors, which arise from complex interactions between carrier flows and the infusion set dead volume. We computed the steady-state mass of drug stored in the infusion set dead volume, using phenylephrine as a model compound. The mass of drug in the dead volume increases with stock drug concentration and desired dose but decreases with carrier flow rate. We also modeled the dynamic perturbations in drug delivery when a carrier is abruptly stopped. Rapid initial carrier flow rates lead to greater depression in drug delivery rate after carrier flow ceases. Rapid drug infusion rates lead to faster restoration of desired drug delivery. Finally, the time to reach a new steady-state after a change in drug delivery or carrier rate was computed. This time is longest for large stock-drug concentrations, larger dead volumes, and slower final carrier rates. These computations illustrate that (a) the dead volume may contain a large mass of drug available for inadvertent bolus, (b) cessation of carrier flow can profoundly reduce drug delivery, and (c) after a change in carrier flow or drug dosing, a significant lag is possible before drug delivery achieves steady state. Although computed for phenylephrine, the concepts are generic and valid for any drug administered by IV infusion.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Moss, K. Bartels, G. L. Peterfreund, M. A. Lovich, N. M. Sims, and R. A. Peterfreund
An In Vitro Analysis of Central Venous Drug Delivery by Continuous Infusion: The Effect of Manifold Design and Port Selection
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2009;
109(5):
1524 - 1529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Decaudin, S. Dewulf, D. Lannoy, N. Simon, A. Secq, C. Barthelemy, B. Debaene, and P. Odou
Impact of Multiaccess Infusion Devices on In Vitro Drug Delivery During Multi-Infusion Therapy
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2009;
109(4):
1147 - 1155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bartels, D. R. Moss, and R. A. Peterfreund
An Analysis of Drug Delivery Dynamics via a Pediatric Central Venous Infusion System: Quantification of Delays in Achieving Intended Doses
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2009;
109(4):
1156 - 1161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|