JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mitsuyo, T. Articles by Carstens, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mitsuyo, T. Articles by Carstens, E. Related Collections Pain Pharmacology

---

PAIN MEDICINE

Etomidate Depresses Lumbar Dorsal Horn Neuronal Responses to Noxious Thermal Stimulation in Rats

Toshihiko Mitsuyo, MD, Joseph F. Antognini, MD^*, and Earl Carstens, PhD

*Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Department of Anesthesiology, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Joseph F. Antognini, MD, Department of Anesthesiology TB-170, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616. Address e-mail to jfantognini{at}ucdavis.edu.

Etomidate is a widely used IV anesthetic, but little is known about its analgesic properties, in particular, its effects on spinal cord neuronal responses to noxious stimuli. We hypothesized that etomidate would depress lumbar neuronal responses to noxious heat. Rats (n = 15) were anesthetized with isoflurane (1.2%) and laminectomy was performed to record single unit activity. Lumbar neuronal responses to noxious thermal (52°C, 12 s) stimulation of the hindpaw were recorded before and every 2 min (up to 13 min postinjection) after administration of etomidate. The responses at peak effect of etomidate (as a percentage of the control response) were 63% ± 16%, 63% ± 16%, 38% ± 25%, 36% ± 30%, and 41% ± 26% for the 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg doses, respectively. The responses quickly recovered, usually by the 10-min period postinjection. Similar responses were obtained in decerebrate, isoflurane-free rats administered etomidate and in isoflurane-anesthetized rats administered propofol. These data demonstrate that etomidate depresses spinal cord neuronal responses to noxious stimulation and is a possible mechanism by which this drug might produce analgesia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. S. Barter, L. O. Mark, S. L. Jinks, E. E. Carstens, and J. F. Antognini Immobilizing Doses of Halothane, Isoflurane or Propofol, Do Not Preferentially Depress Noxious Heat-Evoked Responses of Rat Lumbar Dorsal Horn Neurons with Ascending Projections Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 985 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kim, A. Yao, R. Atherley, E. Carstens, S. L. Jinks, and J. F. Antognini Neurons in the Ventral Spinal Cord Are More Depressed by Isoflurane, Halothane, and Propofol Than Are Neurons in the Dorsal Spinal Cord Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1020 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Merrill, L. S. Barter, U. Rudolph, E. I. Eger II, J. F. Antognini, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens Propofol's effects on nociceptive behavior and spinal c-fos expression after intraplantar formalin injection in mice with a mutation in the gamma-aminobutyric acid-type(A) receptor beta3 subunit. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 478 - 83, table of contents. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999