JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, R. C. Articles by Cohen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carroll, R. C. Articles by Cohen, E. Related Collections Blood Cardiovascular Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Measurement of Patients' Bivalirudin Plasma Levels by a Thrombelastograph® Ecarin Clotting Time Assay: A Comparison to a Standard Activated Clotting Time

Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee; Haemoscope Corporation, Niles, Illinois

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Roger C. Carroll, PhD, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37920. Address e-mail to RCarrol1{at}utk.edu.

Standard activated clotting time (ACT) tests have a poor correlation to bivalirudin levels, leading to uncertainty regarding adequate anticoagulation in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. We tested a Thrombelastograph® (TEG®) ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay for sensitivity to bivalirudin using blood from 80 patients undergoing interventional cardiology procedures with bivalirudin anticoagulation. This was compared to a standard Hemochron ACT assay using diatomaceous earth. With the TEG® assay, the direct thrombin activator, ecarin, was used to initiate coagulation and measured as the reaction time. Plasma samples were evaluated for bivalirudin by a chromogenic assay at an independent hematological laboratory. Linear regression of the standard ACT versus bivalirudin level gave an r² = 0.306 whereas the TEG® ECT gave a much higher r² = 0.746 (both P < 0.0001). The TEG® ECT should prove more useful than the standard ACT for monitoring bivalirudin anticoagulation across the clinically therapeutic range.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Ganter and C. K. Hofer Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1366 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Tanaka, F. Szlam, H. Y. Sun, T. Taketomi, and J. H. Levy Thrombin Generation Assay and Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitors Demonstrate Differences in the Mode of Thrombin Inhibition Between Unfractionated Heparin and Bivalirudin Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 933 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Levy, K. A. Tanaka, and M. J. Hursting Reducing Thrombotic Complications in the Perioperative Setting: An Update on Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 570 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999