JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I., II
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:1397-1406
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000219019.91281.51


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Contrasting Roles of the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor in the Production of Immobilization by Conventional and Aromatic Anesthetics

Edmond I. Eger, II, MD*, Mark Liao, BS*, Michael J. Laster, DVM*, Albert Won, MS*, John Popovich, BS*, Douglas E. Raines, MD{dagger}, Ken Solt, MD{dagger}, Robert C. Dutton, MD*, Franklin V. Cobos, II, MD{ddagger}, and James M. Sonner, MD*

Received from the *Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California, the {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska

Address correspondence to Dr. Edmond I Eger II, Department of Anesthesia, S-455, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–0464. Address e-mail to egere{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu.

We hypothesized that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors mediate some or all of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to prevent movement in the face of noxious stimulation, and that this capacity to prevent movement correlates directly with the in vitro capacity of such anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. To test this hypothesis, we measured the effect of IV infusion of the NMDA blockers dizocilpine (MK-801) and (R)-4-(3-phosphonopropyl) piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (CPP) to decrease the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic that prevents movement in 50% of subjects given a noxious stimulation) of 8 conventional anesthetics (cyclopropane, desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and xenon) and 8 aromatic compounds (benzene, fluorobenzene, o-difluorobenzene, p-difluorobenzene, 1,2,4-trifluorobenzene, 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene, pentafluorobenzene, and hexafluorobenzene) and, for comparison, etomidate. We postulated that MK-801 or CPP infusions would decrease MAC in inverse proportion to the in vitro capacity of these anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. This notion proved correct for the aromatic inhaled anesthetics, but not for the conventional anesthetics. At the greatest infusion of MK-801 (32 µg · kg–1· min–1) the MACs of conventional anesthetics decreased by 59.4 ± 3.4% (mean ± sd) and at 8 µg · kg–1· min–1 by 45.5 ± 4.2%, a decrease not significantly different from a 51.4 ± 19.0% decrease produced in the EC50 for etomidate, an anesthetic that acts solely by enhancing {gamma}-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors. We conclude that some aromatic anesthetics may produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation by blocking the action of glutamate on NMDA receptors but that conventional inhaled anesthetics do not.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, M. Tang, M. Liao, M. J. Laster, K. Solt, P. Flood, A. Jenkins, D. Raines, J. F. Hendrickx, S. L. Shafer, et al.
Inhaled Anesthetics Do Not Combine to Produce Synergistic Effects Regarding Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration in Rats
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Yao, J. Kim, R. Atherley, S. L. Jinks, E. Carstens, S. Shargh, A. Sulger, and J. F. Antognini
The Effects of Aromatic Anesthetics on Dorsal Horn Neuronal Responses to Noxious Stimulation
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1759 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Zhang, Y. Dong, B. Zhang, F. Ichinose, X. Wu, D. J. Culley, G. Crosby, R. E. Tanzi, and Z. Xie
Isoflurane-Induced Caspase-3 Activation Is Dependent on Cytosolic Calcium and Can Be Attenuated by Memantine
J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4551 - 4560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Irifune, S. Katayama, T. Takarada, Y. Shimizu, C. Endo, T. Takata, K. Morita, T. Dohi, T. Sato, and M. Kawahara
MK-801 enhances gabaculine-induced loss of the righting reflex in mice, but not immobility: [Le MK-801 accentue la perte du reflexe de redressement provoque par la gabaculine chez les souris, mais pas l'immobilite]
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2007; 54(12): 998 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Kim, A. Yao, R. Atherley, E. Carstens, S. L. Jinks, and J. F. Antognini
Neurons in the Ventral Spinal Cord Are More Depressed by Isoflurane, Halothane, and Propofol Than Are Neurons in the Dorsal Spinal Cord
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1020 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Irifune, N. Kikuchi, T. Saida, T. Takarada, Y. Shimizu, C. Endo, K. Morita, T. Dohi, T. Sato, and M. Kawahara
Riluzole, a Glutamate Release Inhibitor, Induces Loss of Righting Reflex, Antinociception, and Immobility in Response to Noxious Stimulation in Mice
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1415 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Zhang, M. J. Laster, E. I. Eger II, M. Sharma, and J. M. Sonner
Lidocaine, MK-801, and MAC
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1098 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. F. Antognini, D. E. Raines, K. Solt, L. S. Barter, R. J. Atherley, E. Bravo, M. J. Laster, K. Jankowska, and E. I. Eger II
Hexafluorobenzene Acts in the Spinal Cord, Whereas O-Difluorobenzene Acts in Both Brain and Spinal Cord, to Produce Immobility
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 822 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. F. Antognini, R. J. Atherley, R. C. Dutton, M. J. Laster, E. I. Eger II, and E. Carstens
The Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Nitrous Oxide on Spinal Neuronal Responses to Noxious Stimulation
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II
Does the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Contribute to the Effects of Isoflurane, Sevoflurane, and Ethanol?
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 220 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Sato, N. Seo, and E. Kobayashi
Does the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Contribute to the Effects of Isoflurane, Sevoflurane, and Ethanol?
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 219 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. P. Ng and J. F. Antognini
Isoflurane and Propofol Have Similar Effects on Spinal Neuronal Windup at Concentrations that Block Movement
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Tanifuji, Y. Zhang, M. Liao, E. I. Eger II, M. J. Laster, and J. M. Sonner
Do Dopamine Receptors Mediate Part of MAC?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1177 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.