This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Minville, V. Articles by Samii, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Minville, V. Articles by Samii, K. Related Collections Regional Anesthesia Pharmacology

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Spinal Anesthesia Using Single Injection Small-Dose Bupivacaine Versus Continuous Catheter Injection Techniques for Surgical Repair of Hip Fracture in Elderly Patients

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University of Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vincent Minville, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, Hospital of Rangueil, Orthopedic Section, Toulouse, France. Address e-mail to vincentminville{at}yahoo.fr.

Aging and disease may make elderly patients particularly susceptible to hypotension during spinal anesthesia. We compared the hemodynamic effect of continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) and small dose single injection spinal anesthesia (SA) regarding the incidence of hypotension. Seventy-four patients aged >75 yr undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture were randomized into 2 groups of 37 patients each. Group CSA received a continuous spinal anesthetic with a titration of 2.5 mg boluses every 15 min of isobaric bupivacaine, while group SA received a single injection spinal anesthetic with 7.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine. The overall variations in noninvasive automated arterial blood pressure were not statistically significantly different in the 2 groups at baseline and after CSA or SA (not significant). In the SA group, 68% of patients experienced at least one episode of hypotension (decrease in systolic arterial blood pressure greater than 20% of baseline value) versus 31% of patients in the CSA group (P = 0.005). In the SA group, 51% of patients experienced at least one episode of severe hypotension (decrease in systolic arterial blood pressure more than 30% of baseline value) versus 8% of patients in the CSA group (P < 0.0001). In the CSA group, 4.5 ± 2 mg of ephedrine was injected versus 11 ± 2 mg in the SA group (P = 0.005). In the CSA group, 5 mg (2.5–10) of anesthetic solution was required versus 7.5 mg in the SA group (P < 0.0001). We conclude that, in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair, CSA provides fewer episodes of hypotension and severe hypotension compared with a single intrathecal injection of 7.5 mg bupivacaine.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Minville, K. Asehnoune, S. Salau, B. Bourdet, B. Tissot, V. Lubrano, and O. Fourcade The Effects of Spinal Anesthesia on Cerebral Blood Flow in the Very Elderly Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1291 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rabinowitz, B. Bourdet, V. Minville, C. Chassery, A. Pianezza, A. Colombani, B. Eychenne, K. Samii, and O. Fourcade The Paramedian Technique: A Superior Initial Approach to Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in the Elderly Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1855 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]