JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadoi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadoi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroanesthesia
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2006;103:168-172
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221188.09510.75


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

The Comparative Effects of Sevoflurane Versus Isoflurane on Cerebrovascular Carbon Dioxide Reactivity in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Yuji Kadoi, MD, Ken-ichiro Takahashi, MD, Shigeru Saito, MD, and Fumio Goto, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yuji Kadoi, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. Address e-mail to kadoi{at}med.gunma-u.ac.jp.

The use of volatile anesthetics has been reported to alter cerebrovascular carbon dioxide (CO2) reactivity. We examined the comparative effects of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in 40 patients with diabetes mellitus. Anesthesia was maintained with either 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of isoflurane in 33% oxygen and 67% nitrous oxide. A 2.5-MHz pulsed transcranial Doppler probe was attached to the patient's head at the right temporal window for continuous measurement of mean blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery. After establishing baseline middle cerebral artery velocity values and cardiovascular hemodynamics, we increased end-tidal CO2 by decreasing ventilatory frequency by 2–5 breaths/min and repeated the measurements. These were then used to calculate absolute and relative CO2 reactivity. Absolute CO2 reactivity was less in insulin-treated patients with either sevoflurane or isoflurane compared with those patients on oral antidiabetic drugs or dietary therapy (sevoflurane group: diet = 2.6 ± 0.6; oral antidiabetic drug = 2.5 ± 0.8; insulin = 1.6 ± 0.8*; isoflurane group: diet = 3.3 ± i0.7; oral antidiabetic drug = 3.4 ± 0.7; insulin = 1.9 ± 0.7* cm · s–1 · mm Hg–1; *P < 0.05, respectively). Relative CO2 reactivity showed a similar pattern in the diet-controlled and oral antidiabetic groups, absolute and relative CO2 reactivities were lower with sevoflurane versus isoflurane. Hence, we conclude that cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in insulin-dependent patients is impaired under both sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Kadoi, S. Saito, C. Kawauchi, H. Hinohara, and F. Kunimoto
Comparative effects of propofol vs dexmedetomidine on cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in patients with septic shock
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.