JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Casati, A. Articles by Fanelli, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Casati, A. Articles by Fanelli, G. Related Collections Anesthetic Techniques Regional Anesthesia

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine for Lower Limb Outpatient Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Evaluation

From the University of Parma, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, Ospedale Maggiore di Parma, Parma, Italy.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrea Casati, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Via Gramsci 14 – 43100 Parma, Italy. Address e-mail to acasati{at}ao.pr.it.

We evaluated the dose-response relationship of 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient procedure in 45 ASA physical status I-II outpatients undergoing elective lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia, with 30 mg (group Chlor-30, n = 15), 40 mg (group Chlor-40, n = 15), or 50 mg (group Chlor-50, n = 15) of 1% preservative free 2-chloroprocaine. Onset time was similar in the three groups. General anesthesia was never required to complete surgery. Intraoperative analgesic supplementation as a result of insufficient duration of spinal block was required in 5 patients of group Chlor-30 (35%) and 2 patients of group Chlor-40 (13%) (P = 0.014), with a median (range) time for supplementation request of 40 (30–60) min. Spinal block resolution and recovery of ambulation were faster in group Chlor-30 (60 [41–98] min and 85 [45–123] min) than in groups Chlor-40 (85 [46–141] min and 180 [72–281] min) and Chlor-50 (97 [60–169] min and 185 [90–355] min) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), with no differences in home discharge time (182 [120–267] min in group Chlor-30, 198 [123–271] min in group Chlor-40, and 203 [102–394] min in group Chlor-50; P = 0.155). No transient neurologic symptoms were reported at 24-h and 7-day follow-up. We conclude that although 40 and 50 mg of 2-chloroprocaine provide adequate spinal anesthesia for outpatient procedures lasting 45–60 min, 30 mg produces a spinal block of insufficient duration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Shafer Anesthesia & Analgesia's Policy on Off-Label Drug Administration in Clinical Trials Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 13 - 15. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Casati, G. Fanelli, G. Danelli, M. Berti, D. Ghisi, M. Brivio, M. Putzu, and A. Barbagallo Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine or Preservative-Free 2-Chlorprocaine for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 959 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999